You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

EvaEverywhere ago

I disagree with you 33303. @are_we_sure is one of very few continuous posters here who adds value by bringing up ways to explain away the evidence as anodyne. We all need to do this as well to arm against "debunking" the strongest and best evidence. I am a believer in pizzagate and get called a shill when I provide context for evidence that is picked up here and there. But I don't care since there aren't enough people scrutinizing evidence here. Scrutiny adds value to the evidence. You guys always yelling and itching to use with your brand new pitchfork rather than explore your confirmation bias, are the ones who are NOT providing additional value to the forum.

Are_we_sure ago

Thanks.

I would see it as Plausible, not anondyne though.