Until further notice, for now this will need to be called fake news, since Trey Gowdy's office has been taking calls and declaring false on this all day. Reddit was on the case, have called and apparently you can check this out for yourselves at 202-225-6030.
Why would they not say this if it were real, this is an active investigation for missing law enforcement officers, they wouldn't want to confirm anything to the perp's, its better to say it didn't happen, this is status-quo law enforcement.
Why would Gowdy's office admit that he had sent a team of investigators to the CLINTON LIBRARY to find pizzagate evidence? Crazy, this would be TOP SECRET.
What's known is that TRUMP & CLINTON went to Epstein "fuck island" dozens of times, since the 1990's together, the CLINTON LIBRARY would have photos which would prove times and dates ... Why would GOWDY want the enemy to know that heads-up? So they could destroy the evidence at the CLINTON-LIBRARY?
I smell a fire coming very soon at the CLINTON LIBRARY, where the entire facility burns down to destroy all evidence.
Things get leaked all the time. I have seen journalists run articles as favors to prosecutors who wanted to generate public support for a case. Journalists have constitutional protections to report information that government officials cannot.
I understand leaks. There are leaks that can be legitimized and then there is this. No one in their unsourced articles have claimed insider leaks. Therefore, as much as I wish to believe this, it's unsourced therefore not real at the moment. In any case It could only have helped them to have come out with it had it been real. Let's see, you send investigators to investigate the Clintons and they disappear?? how could a story like that not help?
Well if something is under seal it means a judge ordered everyone to stay silent. So even if deaths happened the seal can only be lifted by the judge. You can literally get charged for violating the seal. Also the reason cases are investigated under seal is so that the prosecution can build a case without the conspirator being able to interfere or prepare a defense. It gives the prosecution an argument edge over the defense. I honestly just would like something other than its a fake site. Is it fake like the onion? Or fake like the enquirer? Many journalists do not publish sources and keep their sources confidential. In this case that would seem within reason. I have a question is wiki leaks considered sourced? We do not know their whistleblowers. Thanks
All the sites carrying the story have a common denominator. No source. Not even a hint of a source. Seriously been in the game for a long time, and normally you can see the match being lit in the forest before the smoke, before the fire. None of that here.
What kind of a source? Do you mean a name of someone who is providing the info? I am not convinced because this would regard an open investigation. So other than your gut from being around a long time, are there any old disproven stories? Have they published retractions? I just want something tangible that discredits these sites as fake. Not an opinion but an actual incident. Publishing false stories is a crime.
No I mean something that is a tangible lead in the story. I did not find one. We are free to believe what we want. I respectfully choose not to believe this story. I will leave that here.
Of course I hope I did not come across as too strong. Not my intention. I myself would love to know why others think it's fake. I thought it was because of the quality of the writing. Another person said that website posted false stories all the time. But no one could give me specifics. It's a mystery now to me. Thanks for your insights appreciate it.
view the rest of the comments →
The_Roman_Numeral ago
Until further notice, for now this will need to be called fake news, since Trey Gowdy's office has been taking calls and declaring false on this all day. Reddit was on the case, have called and apparently you can check this out for yourselves at 202-225-6030.
TrumpsSmellyDick ago
Why would they not say this if it were real, this is an active investigation for missing law enforcement officers, they wouldn't want to confirm anything to the perp's, its better to say it didn't happen, this is status-quo law enforcement.
Why would Gowdy's office admit that he had sent a team of investigators to the CLINTON LIBRARY to find pizzagate evidence? Crazy, this would be TOP SECRET.
What's known is that TRUMP & CLINTON went to Epstein "fuck island" dozens of times, since the 1990's together, the CLINTON LIBRARY would have photos which would prove times and dates ... Why would GOWDY want the enemy to know that heads-up? So they could destroy the evidence at the CLINTON-LIBRARY?
I smell a fire coming very soon at the CLINTON LIBRARY, where the entire facility burns down to destroy all evidence.
The_Roman_Numeral ago
If this was so TOP SECRET, why is it being discussed on Voat?.
Forgetmenot ago
Things get leaked all the time. I have seen journalists run articles as favors to prosecutors who wanted to generate public support for a case. Journalists have constitutional protections to report information that government officials cannot.
The_Roman_Numeral ago
I understand leaks. There are leaks that can be legitimized and then there is this. No one in their unsourced articles have claimed insider leaks. Therefore, as much as I wish to believe this, it's unsourced therefore not real at the moment. In any case It could only have helped them to have come out with it had it been real. Let's see, you send investigators to investigate the Clintons and they disappear?? how could a story like that not help?
Forgetmenot ago
Well if something is under seal it means a judge ordered everyone to stay silent. So even if deaths happened the seal can only be lifted by the judge. You can literally get charged for violating the seal. Also the reason cases are investigated under seal is so that the prosecution can build a case without the conspirator being able to interfere or prepare a defense. It gives the prosecution an argument edge over the defense. I honestly just would like something other than its a fake site. Is it fake like the onion? Or fake like the enquirer? Many journalists do not publish sources and keep their sources confidential. In this case that would seem within reason. I have a question is wiki leaks considered sourced? We do not know their whistleblowers. Thanks
The_Roman_Numeral ago
All the sites carrying the story have a common denominator. No source. Not even a hint of a source. Seriously been in the game for a long time, and normally you can see the match being lit in the forest before the smoke, before the fire. None of that here.
Forgetmenot ago
What kind of a source? Do you mean a name of someone who is providing the info? I am not convinced because this would regard an open investigation. So other than your gut from being around a long time, are there any old disproven stories? Have they published retractions? I just want something tangible that discredits these sites as fake. Not an opinion but an actual incident. Publishing false stories is a crime.
The_Roman_Numeral ago
No I mean something that is a tangible lead in the story. I did not find one. We are free to believe what we want. I respectfully choose not to believe this story. I will leave that here.
Forgetmenot ago
Of course I hope I did not come across as too strong. Not my intention. I myself would love to know why others think it's fake. I thought it was because of the quality of the writing. Another person said that website posted false stories all the time. But no one could give me specifics. It's a mystery now to me. Thanks for your insights appreciate it.