You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Votescam ago

It is a healthy reaction --- but when it results in walking away from the issue as many do, then it works as a force to stop investigations and to stop public knowledge. That is it's purpose. Children telling a story of sexual abuse by males in their lives -- fathers, grandfathers, uncles, male cousins -- may have always been somewhat difficult for the public to totally believe and support, especially when all the perpetrators were male.

Freud's lies to the public in the Oedipus Complex was also a betrayal of his own young patients (both male and female) who had confided in him their sexual abuse by male relatives and male friends of the family. Freud's argument in the Oedipus Complex was outrageous of course and relied on convincing the public of the grotesque and glaring lie that it is infants and toddlers and young children who are the sexual aggressors against adult males in their families.

If the public couldn't figure out that lie, try coupling it with Satan Ritual Abuse .... where children in the McMartin case tried to explain being whisked away into the mountains nearby and onto a plane and taken to Disneyland where Satanic Rituals took place. And, especially when this Satanic abuse is linked to religion/church.

We can also probably look to RCC's "inquisitions" which would have produced a great deal of information early on about torture, multiple personalities, fear, mind control .... where new precedents of violence were used and records were kept and studied.