In 1921, the London Times presented conclusive proof that the Protocols was a "clumsy plagiarism." The Times confirmed that the Protocols had been copied in large part from a French political satire that never mentioned Jews—Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864). Other investigations revealed that one chapter of a Prussian novel, Hermann Goedsche's Biarritz (1868), also "inspired" the Protocols.

Anti-Semites claim it doesn't matter if it's a forgery, because the source material (targeted at the Mixed Multitude) has "come true". But the source material is about a set of circumstances that has always exists and continues to exist, so it's not as prophetic as they think. All they've done is removed a useful label (Mixed Multitude) and replaced it with a useless one (da jooz), which is the MO of anti-Semites. You've seen how Amalek reacts when I ask him to name one evil elite Jew who's Orthodox, he just stops responding. Yet he continues (along with all the crazies on Voat) to claim that secular Jews are following the Talmud (which only Orthodox follow). At its core, anti-Semitism is just militant atheism, since a trivial 60 seconds of research will reveal this claim to be false, but agreeing to its falsity would mean being kind to religion.