There's a very easy way to see whether mods are shills and that is to review their Comment history.
We have to remove all posts that violate the community-established submission rules for v/pizzagate -- whether we think the user is an actual shill or just not paying attention to the guidelines. If we don't enforce them consistently, the folks at v/ProtectVoat will remove mods for censorship. Without the submission guidelines, we wouldn't be able to remove any posts AT ALL due to Voat's extreme commitment to free speech. It is neither simple nor efficient, but it's the best system we have here to date. Serious users committed to researching Pizzagate will make the effort to post within the guidelines, and repost removed submissions with additions/corrections that make them solid research posts.
Oh...and I would recommend reading through the comment history of whomever you see spewing vitriol about mods or other users via ad hominem attacks -- especially when they provide not links to examples of whatever they are claiming.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
There's a very easy way to see whether mods are shills and that is to review their Comment history.
We have to remove all posts that violate the community-established submission rules for v/pizzagate -- whether we think the user is an actual shill or just not paying attention to the guidelines. If we don't enforce them consistently, the folks at v/ProtectVoat will remove mods for censorship. Without the submission guidelines, we wouldn't be able to remove any posts AT ALL due to Voat's extreme commitment to free speech. It is neither simple nor efficient, but it's the best system we have here to date. Serious users committed to researching Pizzagate will make the effort to post within the guidelines, and repost removed submissions with additions/corrections that make them solid research posts.
Oh...and I would recommend reading through the comment history of whomever you see spewing vitriol about mods or other users via ad hominem attacks -- especially when they provide not links to examples of whatever they are claiming.