@Vindicator@wecanhelp@Millenial_Falcon this sub needs to be removed based on at least Rules 1 and 4. This is the 3rd account for this OP.
OP gets shitty with people for calling out their crap and then claims not to have online capabilities to include actual research with the post. Meanwhile many others actually do follow the sub rules and actually do research. I call click bait for upvoats!!!
Thanks for the ping, cult_of_philanthropy. I don't see how this is a violation of either rule? It's a link to an ABC News article -- so it's sourced, and the word dropped from the headline was immediately clarified/corrected by the OP in the comments. When I looked at his submission history, he doesn't have a history of shitposting. Please link me to the posts that gave you that impression.
Overall, I would say this was a positive contribution -- especially since it involved an actual bust -- and a lot of good links came together in the comments. We have a lot of unhelpful crap posted on this sub every day; I wouldn't put this in the same category.
Lol wtf is your problem. I corrected it immediately in the comments section I left out the word racetrack it's what's known as a mistake get over it.. you must either be female or under 25. What's this 3rd account you're on about? I have one account and it looks like I've been here longer than you get over yourself.
NO your correction was wrong!!! "The title should read "Owner of NASCAR racetrack". He is not the owner of NASCAR sorry."
If you're ignorant on your topic don't post, or do some research first. NASCAR doesn't own this track!!! These are independently owned. If you'd bothered to actually read the article to which you linked...or even searched Voat you'd know this. Instead you linked to an article because you saw a major corporation in the title. Nor did you bother to link to any other subs already posted by others that have done actual research.
Then you reply to an honest researcher saying you don't have online capabilities. Really?!!! Seems like you can post on Voat just fine.
Then this at me, " you must either be female or under 25."...way to play the sex card!!
The only thing you need to know about me is that YOU don't intimidate me.
view the rest of the comments →
cult_of_philanthropy ago
@Vindicator @wecanhelp @Millenial_Falcon this sub needs to be removed based on at least Rules 1 and 4. This is the 3rd account for this OP. OP gets shitty with people for calling out their crap and then claims not to have online capabilities to include actual research with the post. Meanwhile many others actually do follow the sub rules and actually do research. I call click bait for upvoats!!!
Vindicator ago
Thanks for the ping, cult_of_philanthropy. I don't see how this is a violation of either rule? It's a link to an ABC News article -- so it's sourced, and the word dropped from the headline was immediately clarified/corrected by the OP in the comments. When I looked at his submission history, he doesn't have a history of shitposting. Please link me to the posts that gave you that impression.
Overall, I would say this was a positive contribution -- especially since it involved an actual bust -- and a lot of good links came together in the comments. We have a lot of unhelpful crap posted on this sub every day; I wouldn't put this in the same category.
HillBoulder ago
Vindicated by the vindicator! Thanks
HillBoulder ago
Lol wtf is your problem. I corrected it immediately in the comments section I left out the word racetrack it's what's known as a mistake get over it.. you must either be female or under 25. What's this 3rd account you're on about? I have one account and it looks like I've been here longer than you get over yourself.
cult_of_philanthropy ago
NO your correction was wrong!!! "The title should read "Owner of NASCAR racetrack". He is not the owner of NASCAR sorry."
If you're ignorant on your topic don't post, or do some research first. NASCAR doesn't own this track!!! These are independently owned. If you'd bothered to actually read the article to which you linked...or even searched Voat you'd know this. Instead you linked to an article because you saw a major corporation in the title. Nor did you bother to link to any other subs already posted by others that have done actual research.
Then you reply to an honest researcher saying you don't have online capabilities. Really?!!! Seems like you can post on Voat just fine.
Then this at me, " you must either be female or under 25."...way to play the sex card!!
The only thing you need to know about me is that YOU don't intimidate me.
My error on the other account names.
HillBoulder ago
Well bud I think the only thing left for me to do is to tell you to shove it up your ass.
cult_of_philanthropy ago
Another "intelligent" reply from HillBoulder. I expected nothing less.
HillBoulder ago
I have a new label for people such as yourself: SJW-Submission Justice Warrior