Yeah, we'll see. I've spent literally hundreds of hours on the McCann case and:
sniffer dogs don't lie - she's dead
her parents have lied repeatedly
so have their friends
there are many disturbing connections between the case and the pedophile establishment in the UK
I'll be impressed if this isn't just more muddying of the waters. On the other hand, it was an Australian channel that aired a stunning expose of the Brit pedo hierarchy so you never know.
I know next to nothing about this case, can you help me out with these points?
*
Sniffer dogs may not lie, but I think there are times their handlers can make them indicate more or less on command.
*
Do you have examples of their lying?
*
What incentive do their friends have for lying for them? Unless they are somehow implicated themselves. I'm sure as hell if I killed my child my friends wouldn't lie for me, that's pretty heinous.
*
What connections are these? Government or?
And don't forget that Australia has close ties with the UK.
Edit: my dumbass doesn't know how to format the bullets.
Sniffer dogs irrelevant in face of deliberately photoshopped images of Madeleine and Gerry by the pool, work of deep state psyop, Tavistock lead. Implantation of RFID agenda coincides with this case.
Read the Gasper statements for confirmation of paedophilic activity in the group.
Government connections, Jim Gamble, Gordon Brown, Miliband brothers, Tony Blair also his spin doctor...
OK, it's a LOT of work though to get familiar. Probably the best and most thorough introductions are Richard D Hall's documentaries.
Sniffer dogs may not lie, but I think there are times their handlers can make them indicate more or less on command.
Not in this particular case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U2FPr5Ndo8 - start at 56m in. Eddie and Keela have an outstanding record in criminal cases. The McCanns accused them of being signaled by their handler.
Do you have examples of their lying?
There's an embarrassment of riches here. The most disturbing analysis for me was one done by an expert on statement analysis who concluded they were lying about all sorts of things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slziMpXYjJo
Just an example: they lied about the window being smashed or forced open. It wasn't.
What incentive do their friends have for lying for them? Unless they are somehow implicated themselves
Bingo.
What connections are these? Government or?
The McCanns knew Clement Freud, grandson of Sigmund, a known pedophile. Freud's son-in-law sold them art. Freud himself owned the apartment next door and also knew the Podestas. In less than 24 hours after her reported disappearance the number of high-level connected people from the British establishment who were swarming around the site in Portugal was extraordinary. Their PR manager was a top government spin doctor. They communicated directly with present and former Prime Ministers.
My pet theory: Madeleine was sacrificed in a ritual ceremony the week before. The event was attended by many high up personages in whatever sick elite organisation organized this. She was brought up by the McCanns but was not their daughter.
Edit: please don't downvoat the parent - they were genuine questions.
I don't know how to explain the decade-long media circus around the case. If it was a sacrifice, wouldn't the media be strong-armed into keeping it relatively quiet like Pedogate?
The media circus was driven by the McCanns themselves for the most part. I think the coverup plan was this: create an abduction story to appeal to ordinary people and deflect criticism away from the parents and their friends. But it backfired: the Portuguese police were very competent and lots of people started asking questions.
view the rest of the comments →
paulf ago
Yeah, we'll see. I've spent literally hundreds of hours on the McCann case and:
I'll be impressed if this isn't just more muddying of the waters. On the other hand, it was an Australian channel that aired a stunning expose of the Brit pedo hierarchy so you never know.
fortuitouslyunfallen ago
I know next to nothing about this case, can you help me out with these points?
* Sniffer dogs may not lie, but I think there are times their handlers can make them indicate more or less on command.
* Do you have examples of their lying?
* What incentive do their friends have for lying for them? Unless they are somehow implicated themselves. I'm sure as hell if I killed my child my friends wouldn't lie for me, that's pretty heinous.
* What connections are these? Government or?
And don't forget that Australia has close ties with the UK.
Edit: my dumbass doesn't know how to format the bullets.
ProbablyHoly ago
Sniffer dogs irrelevant in face of deliberately photoshopped images of Madeleine and Gerry by the pool, work of deep state psyop, Tavistock lead. Implantation of RFID agenda coincides with this case.
Read the Gasper statements for confirmation of paedophilic activity in the group.
Government connections, Jim Gamble, Gordon Brown, Miliband brothers, Tony Blair also his spin doctor...
paulf ago
OK, it's a LOT of work though to get familiar. Probably the best and most thorough introductions are Richard D Hall's documentaries.
Not in this particular case: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6U2FPr5Ndo8 - start at 56m in. Eddie and Keela have an outstanding record in criminal cases. The McCanns accused them of being signaled by their handler.
There's an embarrassment of riches here. The most disturbing analysis for me was one done by an expert on statement analysis who concluded they were lying about all sorts of things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slziMpXYjJo Just an example: they lied about the window being smashed or forced open. It wasn't.
Also see here.
Bingo.
The McCanns knew Clement Freud, grandson of Sigmund, a known pedophile. Freud's son-in-law sold them art. Freud himself owned the apartment next door and also knew the Podestas. In less than 24 hours after her reported disappearance the number of high-level connected people from the British establishment who were swarming around the site in Portugal was extraordinary. Their PR manager was a top government spin doctor. They communicated directly with present and former Prime Ministers.
My pet theory: Madeleine was sacrificed in a ritual ceremony the week before. The event was attended by many high up personages in whatever sick elite organisation organized this. She was brought up by the McCanns but was not their daughter.
Edit: please don't downvoat the parent - they were genuine questions.
fortuitouslyunfallen ago
Thanks for all the info. I think it gets a lot worse when high-level connections can be made, as the likelihood of prosecution becomes less and less.
paulf ago
Not for much longer. The Day of The Rope is nigh.
Kristina_Gilliam ago
I don't know how to explain the decade-long media circus around the case. If it was a sacrifice, wouldn't the media be strong-armed into keeping it relatively quiet like Pedogate?
paulf ago
The media circus was driven by the McCanns themselves for the most part. I think the coverup plan was this: create an abduction story to appeal to ordinary people and deflect criticism away from the parents and their friends. But it backfired: the Portuguese police were very competent and lots of people started asking questions.