You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

"I believe that there is a 95% probability that the voice in "Fatherhood" is in fact John Podesta."

And I believe there is a 100% probability that the voice is NOT John Podesta.

;-)

rwb ago

Of course you can get away with saying that because you're presumably a mathematics aficionado to some extent and thus recognize two glaring errors on the part of the OP, one of syntax, and the other of logic. In the strictest sense, of course I agree with you, the voice is not John Podesta because a voice is not a person, but I assign a definite probability value to the voice in the fatherhood video also being the voice of John Podesta, and the value is not zero, therefore, the video must remain of interest, even if quite obliquely.

DarkMath ago

"the video must remain of interest"

Absolutely. And we notified the FBI and local Law Enforcement of that video so many times they started to hang up on people who reported it.

It's odd people would keep posting about it over and over and over again. And then edit the video over and over and over again to the point you begin thinking why is someone tweaking the video so often. It feels like a hoax.

Pizzalawyer ago

Releasing it in bits and pieces insures that interest does not wane.

DarkMath ago

"insures that interest does not wane."

I think you mean ensure. The problem with ensuring it stays in the front of people's minds is at some point people stop listening entirely and even get pissed off. But you could be right. Maybe it's like a Peter and the Wolf thing and in the end the wolf does show up.