He talks about possible paedo connections several times. I'm about to start watching part 5 of 6 and at the end of part 4, he left it hanging with "Were the McCanns connected in any way to a paedophile ring?" - sounds like it's about to get juicy. No mention of those Podesta brother e-fits but maybe he'll say something...
Here's a link to Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQgmtrOeDLM
And this comes after, by the way, a Mirror article published yesterday with an odd quote from a teenage nanny in it: “the best case scenario of a very horrible situation, is that she was procured and taken for a rich person who didn’t have children.” I tried to leave a comment on the Daily Mail talking about just this, and how it's blatant paedo normalisation, but it didn't make it past the moderators- did I get too close?
You can read the full article here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/what-really-happened-night-madeleine-10245222
Enjoy!
view the rest of the comments →
Stormer-chan ago
Seems interesting. Rupert Murdoch "abducted" her. Will be posting to Steemit tomorrow to explain.
equineluvr ago
That wasn't even suggested.
MI5/6 has media operatives, just as the CIA does. It's entirely possible -- even probable -- that The Star was assisting the government.
Stormer-chan ago
Yeah, I was suggesting it, I didn't mean the video series was.