This could crack Pizzagate wide open. Ever wonder what the CPP red-herring was distracting from?
Yes? This is part of what they were hiding.
It's related to Pizzagate by the fact CPP as just mentioned was probably set up for this very reason. They needed a line of defense to protect 31 compromised members of Congress, the ones who just had a bunch of IT equipment "stolen".
I think I can even begin to see the game-plan for the take down. Unless James Comey has a good explanation this really looks like interfering with a Presidential Election
That's enough dirt to get him to resign and the rest will be History. And speaking of History, it's this kind of shit that will require the last 50 years of American History be rewritten.
Civil War 2.0 may have just gone hot.
;-)
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
There's not going to be Civil War.
I think it's hilarious that you now think Comet Ping Pong is a Red Herring. Well whose fault is that? Who were saying Comet Ping Pong was so important in the first place. James Comey? Or this board?
CPP's a red herring is just the new line to take after pouring over the place for months and coming up with what? Some naughty instagram comments and bad art criticism?
Exactly how did Comey interfere? Comey said nothing about this investigation prior to the election. So what's your interference? Are you claiming law enforcement should never look at people working for a campaigh? That there was some investigation into the Trump campaign leaked before the election, but there certainly was no announcement from Comey. Nor should there have been.
Comey's did interfere will the election, but it helped Trump. He never should have sent his letter to Chaffetz either. Giant screwup by him.
Basically, all the while you guys were claiming the dossier was fake news, we were learning that the FBI had collaborated elements of it. Comey recently confirmed to Congress that a criminal investigation was opened. We know now that the FBI was able to attain a FISA warrant covering at least Carter Page last year. The dossier helped with getting this warrant. http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/18/politics/fbi-dossier-carter-page-donald-trump-russia-investigation/index.html
Comey and the Justice Department did not say anything about this last year, thus they didn't interfere with the election. This came out afterwards and if went and got warrant then any surveillance of Page is legal. They are either going to build a case against him or they are not.
This also came out today >Republicans and Democrats agree Susan Rice did nothing wrong with surveillance unmasking
The whole unmasking thing was a smokescreen because the White House is realizing that Trump campaign aides like Page and probably others have been caught on tape. Remember the Midnight Ride of Devin Nunes? Trump falsely claimed Obama had wiretapped him and they had to come up with some story to justify that and to take the focus off Nunes and the others. So they attacked Rice, but everybody knew this was weak sauce and today that was confirmed. She did nothing wrong let alone illegal.
I would guess that Page wasn't the only one they were able to get a warrant on. Manafort's real estate purchases in NYC looks like money laundering. Remember Flynn wanted immunity before speaking to Congress.
I mentioned this thing was real. Folks didn't want to believe me.
PS. That Gateway Pundit idiot, has a "BREAKING" news tag on something the Washington Post published in February. And that idiot thinks this is evidence of corruption.
Oh and in addition to our warrant on Page talking to Russians, Russian intelligence officials are under surveillance by at least 6 countries I can think of. If Americans were talking to those officials, they made be other tape that is sent to the US. That can be used to get other warrants, I believe.
DarkMath ago
Before I proceed to verbally kick your ass for like the 100th time I just want to mention you forgot to respond again about the evidence of thermite in the 9/11 dust samples. Are you finally going to acknowledge the evidence?
Anyway regarding this evenings drivel: "CPP's a red herring is just the new line to take after pouring over the place for months and coming up with what?"
I don't want to blow your mind but that's how it works. Remember "See something, say something."? You see sketchiness that may be evidence of child porn and/or the sexual abuse of children and people investigate. It's actually very normal for any well adjusted human being to freak out when they see possible evidence of a child being abused. THIS IS WHY BROWNSTONE OPERATIONS USE CHILDREN. Pedophilia is the only crime left that will generate such outrage. This is mind-numbingly obvious to most people. This is the bread and butter of any intelligence service these days. It's laughable that you would doubt it.
Do you know anyone in the intelligence community who you could talk to? They should be able to set you straight. Right now your mind can't begin to grasp the depravity that keeps all these Brownstone Ops chugging along. I don't know how many times I have to explain "The Big Lie" to you before you acknowledge that too.
"It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously." - Adolph Hitler
1) Thermite
2) The Big Lie
;-)
RweSure ago
You confuse shadowboxing with kicking my ass. Your internet tough guy antics are kind of sad. If I didn't respond, I probably have a comment written out at home........I only get a certain amount of comments per day cuz otherwise fee fees get hurt. welll this one didn't go through either.......
I'll see if I can post that when I get home. Thermite was not found. Jones and Harritt found red and grey chips they claimed were thermite. They were not. They didn't know the red part was and claimed 5 years ago to do more testing to find it. The red part was clay. The chips are mostly clay, epoxy and iron oxide. They are primer paint bonded to a thin layer of steel. Composition matches the primer paint used on the WTC floor joists. The WTC had 10,000,000 square feet of floor space, so they used a ton of this stuff. Also when you burn it you iron rich microspheres.
DarkMath ago
"Thermite was not found."
I say it was, you say it wasn't. Let's go to the tape.
Two FDNY fireman explain how they saw rivers of molten steel in the basements of the WTC.
Which proves either NIST is incompetent or lying.
"Tough guy"?
No. That's actually frustration that results from you keeping your head up your ass. I gave you evidence but you're too important to look at it.
RweSure ago
Here's the longer post.
There's no way of knowing what type of metal that would be. You can't look at molten metal and say or that's steel ......as opposed to something with a lower melting point like aluminum....like used in aircraft that crashed in the building.
There is zero evidence of thermite. Jones and Harritt are frauds. Even their own testing didn't show thermite. Their evidence of thermite is they found red and grey chips and iron microspheres in the dust. However, both have other way more plausible explanations. And they didn't find enough iron or aluminum in these red/grey chips. You can't have thermite if these are less than 10% of the mix. And it was elemental aluminum. Jones and Harritt didn't even know what the red part is. They promised to do more testing and to document their test so it could be replicated.......years ago. They haven't done any of these things.
When another test was done on this chips, the red substance was found to be kaolin, a clay used in primer paints. The chips being iron oxide, epoxy and kaolin bound togehter, very similar to the primer paints you put on steel. Guess what happens when you burn steel coated with these primer paints? You get iron-rich microspheres. You also get them when you burn steel wool or other very thin applications like wires.
From the real world.
The aluminum that was found was part of the clay. For a substance to be thermite, you lots of aluminum by itself, not as part of a compound.
Also for some fun, look up the detonation velocity of nanothermite, it can't cut steel. Also look up how much nano/thermite is needed to melt steel. You can't paint it on a beam and expect anything.
DarkMath ago
"as opposed to something with a lower melting point like aluminum"
AreWeSure all that aircraft aluminum burned away almost immediately. And yes jet fuel can make aluminum burn. Here's what that looks like:
Where'd the aluminum go?
In fact at the Pentagon almost the entire aluminum 757 burned up into thin air. The only thing they found after the fires were put out was one engine and some landing gear. Ditto for Flight 93, its high speed impact with planet Earth burned up so much aluminum they barely found any metal at all. By your theory they'd have found pools of molten aluminum in the craters in Shanksville and at the Pentagon. None were found.
So you lose again. Sorry. Maybe you should wake the fuck up now and stop being so naive as to think the Deep State could never have done something so ghastly as kill 3,000 of its own citizens on national T.V.