Who sets the standard as to what is good and what is bad? Because maybe in the future they'll say that killing other humans is morally right, because the earth is overpopulated. This is why subjective morality is flawed, because it can change over time, rather than remaining constant, regardless of popular opinion of the public.
This statement means nothing - who evaluates? And what is evaluated? The guy is an idiot. And you are correct. If there is no God, let us eat drink, be merry, and fill our base lusts up to the brim, for tomorrow we die.
@PG_Iz-Retarded If I was an atheist, I can justify that there is no such thing as consequences. I can do whatever I want, because we are just random stardust. Why should I conform to your type of thinking if you're just random stardust. And if there is no God, then nobody has the right to tell me what is right or wrong.
Exactly, who's to judge "consequences"? One man's consequence might be another's pleasure. But on the contrary, there is an objective truth and absolute morality which answers to the inward man's conscience.
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient ... "
Romans chapter one. People hate the idea of God 'cause it limits and damns their sinful ways.
view the rest of the comments →
Spiritual_War ago
Who sets the standard as to what is good and what is bad? Because maybe in the future they'll say that killing other humans is morally right, because the earth is overpopulated. This is why subjective morality is flawed, because it can change over time, rather than remaining constant, regardless of popular opinion of the public.
HollandDrive ago
This statement means nothing - who evaluates? And what is evaluated? The guy is an idiot. And you are correct. If there is no God, let us eat drink, be merry, and fill our base lusts up to the brim, for tomorrow we die.
Spiritual_War ago
@PG_Iz-Retarded If I was an atheist, I can justify that there is no such thing as consequences. I can do whatever I want, because we are just random stardust. Why should I conform to your type of thinking if you're just random stardust. And if there is no God, then nobody has the right to tell me what is right or wrong.
HollandDrive ago
Exactly, who's to judge "consequences"? One man's consequence might be another's pleasure. But on the contrary, there is an objective truth and absolute morality which answers to the inward man's conscience.
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient ... "
Romans chapter one. People hate the idea of God 'cause it limits and damns their sinful ways.
HollandDrive ago
I know you do my friend, and same here.