Just wanted you guys to be aware that while browsing the deleted comments I noticed many removed comments for reason: child porn. One of the trolls is a person who spent quite some time trolling me and @abortionburger had been tagged in to moderate his comments. I had to block him.
I never clicked on anything he said that had a link but watch out. This dude was trying to convince me that the Fatherhood Web video was a hoax to get people to click on the worldcorp website in order to click on child porn. Please be wary of him. He also spent a long time in PMs trying to argue with me about a pedo I had personal knowledge of and tried to scare me making me think if I did not do something right then I would get sued or otherwise be in danger.
The fact that anyone trolls pizzagate researchers with child porn links while calling the fatherhood web video a hoax tells me that Skippy Podesta is hiring him. This same guy claimed that the kid in the video said the name Darren, not John.
To me it sounded like a British accent screaming John, not "Darren."
Please check deleted comments and watch out for similar people and tactics. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/modlog/comment
Please continue reporting that video to the FBI / Trey Gowdy.
view the rest of the comments →
twistedmac11 ago
I'm going to get downvoted to oblivion for this, but do we have any actual proof that it IS John Podesta in that video? "It sounds like him" is not proof. There are billions of people in the world, and some are bound to sound like others. Maybe if someone did a legit voice analysis, then maybe. I'm not saying the video (or worldcorp) should be ignored, or that I wasn't sick to my stomach seeing that shit. But I'm so tired of seeing people pushing that video as being Podesta without any actual proof. We CANNOT get this investigation anywhere based on opinion, and pushing this without factual evidence just makes us look bad, not to mention it's a lawsuit waiting to happen.
Pizzagate is a very sensitive topic, and I know that I personally am guilty of letting my emotions get in the way of facts. We have to focus on establishing clear evidence if we want this to go anywhere.
wincraft71 ago
Meanwhile on the front page:
But a video showing what we believe to be actual child abuse regardless if it is or isn't Podesta, that's just pushing too far right?
twistedmac11 ago
Hey, I never said I agreed with those things either. But we're not talking about that right now, we're talking about the Podesta video. This just all seems like a big case of confirmation bias to me.
wincraft71 ago
But regardless of if it is or is not Podesta, the video itself is still concerning and worthy of being investigated. "It's not Podesta" or "it's a Boston accent" do not offer any detraction to the worthiness of looking at the video at face value. Given the dilution of quality on the front page anyways, we might as well.
It's just bizarre that we present what seems to be child abuse, regardless of it is or is not Podesta, and people immediately want to shut it down in favor of all the other bullshit that's discussed on here. Nobody can definitively prove that it's not child abuse, so it should be fair game for PG.
twistedmac11 ago
For the most part, I agree with that. I never meant the video shouldn't be looked into, or that it's NOT Podesta. I just mean I don't think we should be pushing it as being him without something more concrete to stand on.