what do you not understand? YOU do not define "what" Pizzagate is. The reasonable folks on this forum (and I readily admit some members are not) all recognize this is not an issue about one pizza parlor. why do you find that so hard to grasp?! I have told you this numerous times. I have also been present when others have reminded you of this.
if anyone has the authority to define what circumstances and phenomena are part of "Pizzagate" - a term which didn't exist a year ago - it's the people who have actually contributed to investigative work, not you.
re: the Sibel Edmonds testimony if you had done even a modicum of research you would know that she testified about the intelligence agencies knowing about ongoing sexual blackmail while under oath in front of congress. Additionally, she was presented with a Sam Adams award for her whistleblowing. Is that not proof enough to you?! You would know this if you were capable of actually looking up and absorbing information.
PLEASE TELL ME, because I am genuinely curious due to how dumb you are, exactly what level of educational degrees you actually hold. Then let's compare SAT scores. Or salaries. Personally, I don't believe any of those things are actually indicative of intelligence, however, in your case I'm willing to bet they're so absurdly low that I won't feel bad for schooling and generally mocking someone who is A LOT stupider than I.
view the rest of the comments →
mathemagician33 ago
what do you not understand? YOU do not define "what" Pizzagate is. The reasonable folks on this forum (and I readily admit some members are not) all recognize this is not an issue about one pizza parlor. why do you find that so hard to grasp?! I have told you this numerous times. I have also been present when others have reminded you of this.
if anyone has the authority to define what circumstances and phenomena are part of "Pizzagate" - a term which didn't exist a year ago - it's the people who have actually contributed to investigative work, not you.
re: the Sibel Edmonds testimony if you had done even a modicum of research you would know that she testified about the intelligence agencies knowing about ongoing sexual blackmail while under oath in front of congress. Additionally, she was presented with a Sam Adams award for her whistleblowing. Is that not proof enough to you?! You would know this if you were capable of actually looking up and absorbing information.
PLEASE TELL ME, because I am genuinely curious due to how dumb you are, exactly what level of educational degrees you actually hold. Then let's compare SAT scores. Or salaries. Personally, I don't believe any of those things are actually indicative of intelligence, however, in your case I'm willing to bet they're so absurdly low that I won't feel bad for schooling and generally mocking someone who is A LOT stupider than I.