Is the government preying on the mental health of vulnerable new mothers to justify the removal of the child into care? British MP Tim Yeo says "This council actively seeks opportunities to remove babies from their mothers".
British MP concerns on government social services effectively child kidnapping, see link
https://youtu.be/OQxnGxbildM
Social workers who forced a couple to give up their 11-week-old baby for adoption have been accused of 'child kidnap' by an MP. Staff waited until the girl's father was out before launching a raid with police at the family home to 'snatch the baby from the arms of her mother'.
Tory MP Tim Yeo used Parliamentary privilege to make the allegations in the Commons, saying Suffolk County Council had declared the couple to be unfit parents despite having no evidence of physical or emotional abuse.
Potential Disney involvement harvesting mental health data? Disney have access to sensitive information that could be used against parents.
Bounty, a private promotions company formally owned by Kaboose and bought out by Disney, pays £2.3 million to hospitals across the UK. In return, its sales reps are allowed immediate access to maternity wards within a few hours of childbirth, to distribute promotional baby bags full of samples and discount vouchers.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2342797/How-NHS-makes-millions-letting-sales-reps-badger-new-mums-like-Tessa-beds.html#ixzz4blbEKLNf
Bounty also record personal details of the mom and child including taking several photographs of the child. After harvesting the personal details of new mothers, which importantly include details of any mental health issues such as post natal depression and anxiety, Bounty then sells them onto interested commercial partners and third parties.
Who are these third parties? Could this information file shared by government agencies, such as social services who have been alleged to provide babies for the elite to order, as alleged by Carol Woods?
See whistleblower Carol Woods on falsifying reports against suspected vulnerable parents to ensure babies are taken into social care.
https://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=CN8dvWXyK-s
Any excuse for removal?
Depression two years prior, baby taken into social care
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2518873/Social-workers-came-baby-I-labour-Mother-tells-heartbreak-having-daughter-snatched-away-birth-warning.html
NHS hospital staff raise concerns over parents discussing the benefits of formula milk: One week old baby taken into social care
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/16/parents-had-week-old-baby-taken-away-social-services-father/
view the rest of the comments →
MysticMa ago
This has been going on for quite awhile as I saw first hand what 1st time moms went through. 2000-02 My daughter stayed at RMD House during her course of treatment for ALL. You get to know other families when your stay is extended. I can't count how many times I saw a new mom who was all excited to bring her new miracle of life home to come back to pick up their belongings, sobbing because just as they were leaving the hospital some SS worker told them her she could leave , but without her child. The reasons were so absurd that it was evident then that something was not on the up & up. A single mom is observed in the nick units and the nurses are in on it too. It is their notes that give the validity to the reasons.for abduction. I am a Guardian Ad Litem so I am not just spewing nonsense. Advantage is taken when they think it's possible. I had my hands full at the time, but those moments still haunt me. Voat for me has confirmed a lot of personal thoughts & fears of realities, that had I expressed to anyone else, the outside world would have said I was nuts. They do this a lot with premies that are perfect but just came to early..
YingYangMom ago
Well, I'm glad you could share your story here with us. And no, you're not nuts. You're awake. Big difference :)