Actually I'm thinking to repost this with "according to Google search, roughly...." Because it may be the case that Google is more likely to show 'important' people's arrest, rather than uncle Joe. Maybe if we truly looked at police records, 70% are the next door neighbor. So that would make this title false. We don't want that. What do you think?
I think it not a big issue, and this comment thread being up makes it clear enough already. Sure for the futere visitors, accurate topics are important in general.
view the rest of the comments →
anonOpenPress ago
Is that a fact, a verifiable one? (your topic)
V____Z ago
Goog point, I should have softened the claim, or referenced HBee.
anonOpenPress ago
np, just would have used if it was
V____Z ago
Actually I'm thinking to repost this with "according to Google search, roughly...." Because it may be the case that Google is more likely to show 'important' people's arrest, rather than uncle Joe. Maybe if we truly looked at police records, 70% are the next door neighbor. So that would make this title false. We don't want that. What do you think?
anonOpenPress ago
I think it not a big issue, and this comment thread being up makes it clear enough already. Sure for the futere visitors, accurate topics are important in general.
V____Z ago
Ok, I'm going to be more careful from now on. Voat is our new Wikipedia. We want this to be literally encyclopedic, IMO.
anonOpenPress ago
I'm actually just editing one post heading into that direction. Soon out :)