why are you obsessed with jews? You make yourself seem like some kind of troll animal who is obsessed with your own personal hatred of jewishdom. Where does that come from? I see you on a lot of posts with 'jews" this and 'jews' that. Do you ever talk about anything but your personal hatred of jews?
Most of the time, when someone says Jew, they don't mean all Jews. For example, there are some sects of Judaism that don't mutilate their children, and know that Israel is a terrorist state. Those people are not included under the umbrella term "Jew" or "Jewry".
In fact, Dr. Avshalom Zoossmann-Diskin, one of the most vociferous objectors in Israel to circumcision and the founder of Ben Shalem – an organization which fights circumcision – says that in his many years of anti-circumcision activism he has encountered only one harsh response. That was in 1999, in connection with a petition he submitted to the High Court of Justice against circumcision on the grounds that it violates the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Freedom, the Children’s Charter of Rights and criminal law. After the petition was rejected, the interior minister at the time, Eliahu Suissa (Shas) stated that “the petitioner should be thrown out the window.”
This is why there is an obsession with Judaism. It is not natural. It's satanic, and it rules the world.
“The main difference between a physician and a mohel is that we are allowed to inject an anesthetic and a mohel is not,” Shinhar adds. “Medical studies show that the pain of circumcision is equal to that of having a tooth pulled without an anesthetic."
The Jews inserted this practice into Islam in the 10th century.
They also inserted it into America society
In the United States, circumcision became popular in the mid- to late-19th century as a medical operation aimed at preventing masturbation, which was thought to spread disease and cause madness.
So you're obsessed with some but not all of Judaism.
Questions:
1. Why do you care about Jews but not Catholics?
2. Circumcision is terrible, about as terrible as everything else in the world that other people do. Christians also circumcise and atheists do too.
So again, why are you obsessed with Jews and do you not care that it makes you seem like you have a mental sickness which prevents you from saying or doing anything at all except unless it allows you to say "jews"?
Two of my physics professors at Queen's University (Dr. Stewart & Dr. McKee) were the original developers of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for medical applications. They and a number of other Queen's physicists also worked on improving the accuracy of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for observing metabolic activity within the human body.
As a graduate student working in the Dept. of Epidemiology in 1998, I was approached by a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kingston General Hospital. They said that their observations indicated that babies undergoing the procedure were subjected to significant and inhumane levels of pain that subsequently adversely affected their behaviors. They said that they needed some scientific support for their position. It was my idea to use fMRI and/or PET scanning to directly observe the effects of circumcision on the infant brain.
The operator of the MRI machine in the hospital was a friend of mine, and he agreed to allow us to use the machine for research after normal operational hours. We also found a nurse who was under intense pressure by her husband to have her newborn son circumcised, and she was willing to have her son to be the subject of the study. Her goal was to provide scientific information that would eventually be used to ban male infant circumcision. Since no permission of the ethics committee was required to perform any routine male infant circumcision, we did not feel it was necessary to seek any permission to carry out this study.
We tightly strapped an infant to a traditional plastic "circumstraint" using Velcro restraints. We also completely immobilized the infant's head using standard surgical tape. The apparatus was then introduced into the MRI chamber. The infant's head was in the chamber while the lower part of the infant's body was accessible to the doctor performing the circumcision. Since no metal objects could be used because of the high magnetic fields, the doctor used a plastic bell with a sterilized obsidian bade to cut the foreskin. No anesthetic was used.
The baby was kept in the machine for several minutes to generate baseline data of the normal metabolic activity in the brain. This was used to compare to the data gathered during and after the surgery. Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes.
A neurologist who saw the results postulated that the data indicated that circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim's brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions. Follow up tests on the infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the child's brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery.
Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings in the open medical literature. All of the participants in the research including myself were called before the hospital discipline committee and were severely reprimanded. We were told that while male circumcision was legal under all circumstances in Canada, according to their dubious interpretation of the ethical regulations, any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was prohibited. Not only could we not publish the results of our research, but we also had to destroy all of our results. If we refused to comply, we were all threatened with immediate dismissal and legal action.
I would encourage anyone with access to fMRI and /or PET scanning machines to repeat our research as described above, confirm our results, and then publish the results in the open literature.
It was inserted into our culture in the West, just as was done to Islam. It's a satanic practice. It permanently alters brain chemistry.
Two of my physics professors at Queen's University (Dr. Stewart & Dr. McKee) were the original developers of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for medical applications. They and a number of other Queen's physicists also worked on improving the accuracy of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for observing metabolic activity within the human body.
As a graduate student working in the Dept. of Epidemiology in 1998, I was approached by a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kingston General Hospital. They said that their observations indicated that babies undergoing the procedure were subjected to significant and inhumane levels of pain that subsequently adversely affected their behaviors. They said that they needed some scientific support for their position. It was my idea to use fMRI and/or PET scanning to directly observe the effects of circumcision on the infant brain.
The operator of the MRI machine in the hospital was a friend of mine, and he agreed to allow us to use the machine for research after normal operational hours. We also found a nurse who was under intense pressure by her husband to have her newborn son circumcised, and she was willing to have her son to be the subject of the study. Her goal was to provide scientific information that would eventually be used to ban male infant circumcision. Since no permission of the ethics committee was required to perform any routine male infant circumcision, we did not feel it was necessary to seek any permission to carry out this study.
We tightly strapped an infant to a traditional plastic "circumstraint" using Velcro restraints. We also completely immobilized the infant's head using standard surgical tape. The apparatus was then introduced into the MRI chamber. The infant's head was in the chamber while the lower part of the infant's body was accessible to the doctor performing the circumcision. Since no metal objects could be used because of the high magnetic fields, the doctor used a plastic bell with a sterilized obsidian bade to cut the foreskin. No anesthetic was used.
The baby was kept in the machine for several minutes to generate baseline data of the normal metabolic activity in the brain. This was used to compare to the data gathered during and after the surgery. Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes.
A neurologist who saw the results postulated that the data indicated that circumcision affected most intensely the portions of the victim's brain associated with reasoning, perception and emotions. Follow up tests on the infant one day, one week and one month after the surgery indicated that the child's brain never returned to its baseline configuration. In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery.
Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findings in the open medical literature. All of the participants in the research including myself were called before the hospital discipline committee and were severely reprimanded. We were told that while male circumcision was legal under all circumstances in Canada, according to their dubious interpretation of the ethical regulations, any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was prohibited. Not only could we not publish the results of our research, but we also had to destroy all of our results. If we refused to comply, we were all threatened with immediate dismissal and legal action.
I would encourage anyone with access to fMRI and /or PET scanning machines to repeat our research as described above, confirm our results, and then publish the results in the open literature.
view the rest of the comments →
Psychanaut ago
why are you obsessed with jews? You make yourself seem like some kind of troll animal who is obsessed with your own personal hatred of jewishdom. Where does that come from? I see you on a lot of posts with 'jews" this and 'jews' that. Do you ever talk about anything but your personal hatred of jews?
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
Most of the time, when someone says Jew, they don't mean all Jews. For example, there are some sects of Judaism that don't mutilate their children, and know that Israel is a terrorist state. Those people are not included under the umbrella term "Jew" or "Jewry".
These people are not "Jews":
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/even-in-israel-more-and-more-parents-choose-not-to-circumcise-their-sons-1.436421
This is why there is an obsession with Judaism. It is not natural. It's satanic, and it rules the world.
The Jews inserted this practice into Islam in the 10th century.
They also inserted it into America society
Psychanaut ago
So you're obsessed with some but not all of Judaism. Questions: 1. Why do you care about Jews but not Catholics? 2. Circumcision is terrible, about as terrible as everything else in the world that other people do. Christians also circumcise and atheists do too.
So again, why are you obsessed with Jews and do you not care that it makes you seem like you have a mental sickness which prevents you from saying or doing anything at all except unless it allows you to say "jews"?
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
So back to my conclusion. Fuck the Jews.
Psychanaut ago
This is bullshit. I'm not impressed. So you hate Jews. You want people to congratulate you? You're meaningless. Pity.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
Psychanaut ago
I don't real shill work. Either speak using your words or don't bother.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
It was inserted into our culture in the West, just as was done to Islam. It's a satanic practice. It permanently alters brain chemistry.