So you dont see anything wrong with filming sex-scenes with a 16 year old girl while he was 47.. Wow.. That seems the New Liberal thinking. Trump has a big swamp to drain..
How very liberal thinking from you.. Hope Trump will end this soon. We made laws because unther 18 they are children! So you dont think that law must be followed, because at 16 is not a toddler anymore.. Than 13 or 14 is fine for you also i believe! (because a girl from 13 or 14 is not a toddler eather) And because she made lots of money thats fine. Sick liberal Fucks!
I am no liberal at all, but you seem very unable to discriminate proper.
First of all, shooting a sex scene is not real sex.
Second, the actress was very aware of what she was doing. You sign a contract about the movie-job. In Europe we have btw the concept of limited, but basically given contractual capability for sixteen years old.
Third, the actress, Ms Reed, did never complain about that movie job nor did she file a lawsuit. Au contraire she benefit from that movie by launching her career.
These facts stand in blatant contrast to the case of the Epstein-victims who were tricked into their "jobs", misled, deceived and forced into not-a-movie-scene sex, raped and injured, unlawfully detented, and exploited on their complete legal incapacity in the age of 12,13.
The only thing this Baldwin-case shows is that there are dubious characters in this game, on both sides.
@Catchthem Listen, there is a reason that Epstein was convicted and Polanski as well. Polanski was just denied his attempt to return to the U.S. Evidently you have a different opinion since you are from Europe. Here you do not have to have sex with a minor, you can be charged and convicted for grooming and other types of sexual abuse. That is the law here. You may have a different opinion, but it IS the law. Again, if I were a parent, I would not approve of a 47 yr. old with a 16 yr old in the same bed together. And by the way, we have read on here many times over how there is a history of abusing young actors and actresses in Hollywood. She may have been already damaged by others and also a victim of MK Ultra. Your opinion and ours differ, evidently. That does not make us wrong.
Epstein and Polanski were convicted for REAL acts. No doubt they committed a crime.
What the mirror article is about is a scene in a movie. We do not know if there was real sex or not. There was no report or sue from the actress. But if so, there is not only culpability on the side of Baldwin, but also on the director's and producer's side.
And of all things it's the producer who cries around.
Iuridical and factual preconditions for contracted movie scenes are others than for real life.
Iuridical, factual and psychosexual preconditions ref consenting sexual acting for 16 yo are others than ref forced and unvoluntary acts against 12,13,14 yo and criminal acts in general (all ages).
view the rest of the comments →
wgvdl ago
So what? The young actress based her career on that. Celeb-spam.
Catchthem ago
So you dont see anything wrong with filming sex-scenes with a 16 year old girl while he was 47.. Wow.. That seems the New Liberal thinking. Trump has a big swamp to drain..
wgvdl ago
Nikki Reed did not complain but admitted and built her career on that appearance. So it's a win-win.
Catchthem ago
This world is fucked up..
wgvdl ago
True. You can't exculpate the young actress from responsibility for her behavior. You are no toddler with 16 anymore.
Catchthem ago
How very liberal thinking from you.. Hope Trump will end this soon. We made laws because unther 18 they are children! So you dont think that law must be followed, because at 16 is not a toddler anymore.. Than 13 or 14 is fine for you also i believe! (because a girl from 13 or 14 is not a toddler eather) And because she made lots of money thats fine. Sick liberal Fucks!
wgvdl ago
I am no liberal at all, but you seem very unable to discriminate proper.
First of all, shooting a sex scene is not real sex.
Second, the actress was very aware of what she was doing. You sign a contract about the movie-job. In Europe we have btw the concept of limited, but basically given contractual capability for sixteen years old.
Third, the actress, Ms Reed, did never complain about that movie job nor did she file a lawsuit. Au contraire she benefit from that movie by launching her career.
These facts stand in blatant contrast to the case of the Epstein-victims who were tricked into their "jobs", misled, deceived and forced into not-a-movie-scene sex, raped and injured, unlawfully detented, and exploited on their complete legal incapacity in the age of 12,13.
The only thing this Baldwin-case shows is that there are dubious characters in this game, on both sides.
Catchthem ago
A 47 year old doing stuff like that on a 16 year old girl is called pedofhilia. I am Done with you..
wgvdl ago
You are completely clueless.
carmencita ago
@Catchthem Listen, there is a reason that Epstein was convicted and Polanski as well. Polanski was just denied his attempt to return to the U.S. Evidently you have a different opinion since you are from Europe. Here you do not have to have sex with a minor, you can be charged and convicted for grooming and other types of sexual abuse. That is the law here. You may have a different opinion, but it IS the law. Again, if I were a parent, I would not approve of a 47 yr. old with a 16 yr old in the same bed together. And by the way, we have read on here many times over how there is a history of abusing young actors and actresses in Hollywood. She may have been already damaged by others and also a victim of MK Ultra. Your opinion and ours differ, evidently. That does not make us wrong.
wgvdl ago
Same for you:
Epstein and Polanski were convicted for REAL acts. No doubt they committed a crime.
What the mirror article is about is a scene in a movie. We do not know if there was real sex or not. There was no report or sue from the actress. But if so, there is not only culpability on the side of Baldwin, but also on the director's and producer's side.
And of all things it's the producer who cries around.
Catchthem ago
And you are one of the Sick Fucks we investigate here..
wgvdl ago
I'll spell it out for you
A sex scene in a movie is not real sex.
Iuridical and factual preconditions for contracted movie scenes are others than for real life.
Iuridical, factual and psychosexual preconditions ref consenting sexual acting for 16 yo are others than ref forced and unvoluntary acts against 12,13,14 yo and criminal acts in general (all ages).
I hope you get it.
Catchthem ago
Yes i get it PEDO!
wgvdl ago
You are a moron. sigh