Great you're back. Let's get back to it. You were saying how Woodward and Bernstein should have ended their Watergate investigation as soon as they found out it wasn't about water. Once an investigation into one thing ends it must no longer use the same name that the investigation started with. Is that about right?
.......................
Just kidding, here's where we left off:
"based on your other wacky claims"
You're entitled to your opinion. But you're not entitled to your own facts. And the facts in this case point to
1) Brownstone Operations (a.k.a. institutionalized child rape - (I just invented that term))
2) Charity Fraud (watch Clinton Cash)
3) Drug Smuggling and Organ Harvesting (See George Webb videos).
You have two choices:
1) Ignore the evidence by not watching Clinton Cash and George Webb.
2) Look at the evidence and then tell me how it's wrong and doesn't point to a crime.
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
Great you're back. Let's get back to it. You were saying how Woodward and Bernstein should have ended their Watergate investigation as soon as they found out it wasn't about water. Once an investigation into one thing ends it must no longer use the same name that the investigation started with. Is that about right?
.......................
Just kidding, here's where we left off:
"based on your other wacky claims"
You're entitled to your opinion. But you're not entitled to your own facts. And the facts in this case point to
1) Brownstone Operations (a.k.a. institutionalized child rape - (I just invented that term))
2) Charity Fraud (watch Clinton Cash)
3) Drug Smuggling and Organ Harvesting (See George Webb videos).
You have two choices:
1) Ignore the evidence by not watching Clinton Cash and George Webb.
2) Look at the evidence and then tell me how it's wrong and doesn't point to a crime.
What's it going to be?