"The photograph was taken when the victim was 12 years old and shows her completely naked, from the back. It was shot by her mother, a New Zealand artist. For legal reasons the Herald cannot identify the artist, her daughter or the photograph. The victim, now an adult, said the image is one of many naked photographs of her - taken at a time when she was being sexually abused by two men known to her mother."

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11831790

So many elements in this report which are very familiar to anyone who has researched the global paedogate. The mother is considered an "artist" because she sells photos of nude children in art galleries. The mother had male associates who sexually abused her daughter. Finally, the media is involved in coverup. Understandable that the abuse victim would have name suppression. But there is no reason to not name the mother/photographer who was after all exhibiting the photo in a gallery. I suspect that a clean sweep of paedo in NZ would take down much of the government, media, and judges. They all protect one another