This is precisely the point where your theory falls off the rails. There is zero documentation that supports this wild speculation.
In fact, a code like this wouldn't make any sense. If I said "I'm looking for Cheese Pizza," am I looking for child porn, or am I looking for a female little girl? It's self-contradictory and simultaneously redundant.
The only thing that's been substantiated here is that the exact phrase "Cheese Pizza" has been used for child porn, and the "cooked 4 to 14 minutes" addendum actually makes sense when you describe it as the ages of the children involved. You know what exact phrase cannot be found in the Clinton and Podesta e-mails?
They don't need explaining. Just because something doesn't make sense to you, it doesn't mean that it's code for something nefarious. You certainly can't claim that "hot dog = boy" and "dominoes = domination" without being able to prove it. This list is highly specific, and the burden of proof is on the claimant to back up the claim.
If you can't substantiate the information, then the information is argumentatively bogus.
Besides, other people and myself have already explained those things perfectly sensibly numerous times, and those explanations get ignored. The fact is that those e-mails were never meant for you, and you can't use the fact that you find them confusing as proof of a crime. Of course you find them confusing! They were meant for family and friends who understood the references and the jokes. (References and jokes that anyone should be able to understand. I imagine that Pizzagaters are just deliberately ignorant on this.)
view the rest of the comments →
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
This is precisely the point where your theory falls off the rails. There is zero documentation that supports this wild speculation.
In fact, a code like this wouldn't make any sense. If I said "I'm looking for Cheese Pizza," am I looking for child porn, or am I looking for a female little girl? It's self-contradictory and simultaneously redundant.
The only thing that's been substantiated here is that the exact phrase "Cheese Pizza" has been used for child porn, and the "cooked 4 to 14 minutes" addendum actually makes sense when you describe it as the ages of the children involved. You know what exact phrase cannot be found in the Clinton and Podesta e-mails?
"Cheese pizza."
dustyr ago
So, how to you explain all the other nonsensical references, eg., "dominoes on pizza" & many others in Pedosta emails? Do you work for him BTW?
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
They don't need explaining. Just because something doesn't make sense to you, it doesn't mean that it's code for something nefarious. You certainly can't claim that "hot dog = boy" and "dominoes = domination" without being able to prove it. This list is highly specific, and the burden of proof is on the claimant to back up the claim.
If you can't substantiate the information, then the information is argumentatively bogus.
Besides, other people and myself have already explained those things perfectly sensibly numerous times, and those explanations get ignored. The fact is that those e-mails were never meant for you, and you can't use the fact that you find them confusing as proof of a crime. Of course you find them confusing! They were meant for family and friends who understood the references and the jokes. (References and jokes that anyone should be able to understand. I imagine that Pizzagaters are just deliberately ignorant on this.)
SoonerJJ ago
Why are you here?