Although this article dates from 2012, but Shimatsu makes a strong case based on the activities of MIT's Media Lab, which is an offshoot of DARPA and MKUltra, regarding CP (and child exploitation in Cambodia).
I, for one never believed Schwartz was murdered because MIT does not have any proprietary right to JSTOR. The whole thing always seemed weird, and a smokescreen for the real reason he was killed, never mind the ridiculous story that he could hang himself with a 30" belt.
http://rense.com/general95/swartz.html
Although the article is interesting in itself, can we look further into MIT? Is the murder of that security guard in 2013 related to this?
view the rest of the comments →
meowski ago
Not saying this is false, but it makes a lot of assumptions and it reads like word salad.
If you know how academic repositories like JSTOR hoard publicly funded research, and try to charge the public money to read the research we paid for, it does make perfect sense that Schwartz would be downloading a massive amount of academic papers. No evidence whatsoever that he stumbled ont onto a cache of child porn. The "evidence" provided here is that it took a long time to download the files. That's just stupid. Academic PDFs can be quite large, especially when you're talking about many thousands of them. It would be noticed if he "simply hacked into the web site" or whatever. LOL.
I'm not saying he wasnt murdered, or that MIT isn't involved in some bad stuff... but this article is garbage. Provides no evidence. Can't finish reading it.