(pizzagate)
submitted 8 years ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath 8 years ago
Hey great you're back. Now you can respond to my comment explaining what a red-herring is. Here it is again:
"You're not talking about pizzagate"
Correct! Yes, that's what a RED-HERRING kind of suggests. It's as old as the hills. It goes something like this:
1) Commit a crime.
2) As you walk out drag a red-herring across your trail all the way down to some running water usually it could be anything though.
3) Exit the scene via the stream where your sent can't be held.
Voila!
Like I said, it's been going on for years. Hence the term, red-herring, was coined.
Any clearer now?
PG-IzDumbAsFuck5 8 years ago
1) Buy into a ridiculous obviously fictitious conspiracy theory.
2) Hit a dead end since the conspiracy is fictitious.
3) Move the goal posts and change the conspiracy narrative to something else but still use the same name for it.
4) Profit.
Dipshit,
"Move the goal posts"
That's like saying Woodward and Bernstein should have given up investigating Watergate once they found out it wasn't about water.
;-)
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
Hey great you're back. Now you can respond to my comment explaining what a red-herring is. Here it is again:
"You're not talking about pizzagate"
Correct! Yes, that's what a RED-HERRING kind of suggests. It's as old as the hills. It goes something like this:
1) Commit a crime.
2) As you walk out drag a red-herring across your trail all the way down to some running water usually it could be anything though.
3) Exit the scene via the stream where your sent can't be held.
Voila!
Like I said, it's been going on for years. Hence the term, red-herring, was coined.
Any clearer now?
PG-IzDumbAsFuck5 ago
1) Buy into a ridiculous obviously fictitious conspiracy theory.
2) Hit a dead end since the conspiracy is fictitious.
3) Move the goal posts and change the conspiracy narrative to something else but still use the same name for it.
4) Profit.
DarkMath ago
Dipshit,
"Move the goal posts"
That's like saying Woodward and Bernstein should have given up investigating Watergate once they found out it wasn't about water.
;-)