Apparent child advocate, Kimberly Keith takes to twitter to call Pizzagate a lie. Hows that for advocating? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by johnlupus

Relates to Pizzagate in that she envoked the name to dismiss it and is a child advocate apparently

https://twitter.com/kimberlykeith/status/848310781468966913

Kimberly Keith @kimberlykeith

child welfare, training design, rural community development, counselor, special education, complexity and change, poverty and families

takes to twitter to say:

"Have #benswann and @cbs46 apologized to the people of Atlanta for the #pizzagate lie on their news programming yet?"

"Jones apologized so I was curious. I'd be a ticked-off Atlantan after this on the local news. Now, especially."

She's from Southern Arkansas University: (full bio here) http://kimberlykeith.snappages.com/about.htm

follow on follow on follow on follow on follow on Kimberly Keith Bio Education and Licensure: Licensed Professional Counselor, Appraisal Specialization MEd Agency Counseling, Southern Arkansas University BA Psychology, The University of Texas at Dallas

Professional Experience: Director, Community Connections, SAU Training Development and Design, Academic Partnership in Public Child Welfare, SAU Instructor of Social Work, SAU Parent Educator, Guide to Parenting of K-6 Children, About.com, a New York Times company

Community Work: HEALTH Coalition of Columbia County, Treasurer 2007-2012, Chair 2013 - Present 13th Judicial District Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA), Board Rotary, Paul Harris Fellow South Arkansas Women's Network, Career Achievement Award, 2009 Child Abuse Prevention Council of Columbia County Magnolia Junior Charity League, Board Leadership Magnolia, Board Magnolia Arts, Board

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago

The Clinton Foundation does a lot of work for youths and Pizzagate has targeted the CF specifically. It's not surprising that someone involved with the CF would fire back.

I want to see evidence that the CF doesn't do any good and acts as a conduit for human trafficking. I've seen a lot of speculation, but nothing substantial. Nobody has come forward, no CF "victims" have surfaced, no bodies, no specific disappearances.

Otherwise, all you've got is a circle-jerk acting on an arbitrary premise.

If you want to investigate a crime, you have to prove that a crime has been committed.

ZalesMcMuffin ago

If you want to investigate a crime, you have to prove that a crime has been committed.

No, you only need to have a situation where a crime has been committed, whether or not you can "prove" that it has.

PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago

Did you witness the crime? Because that's literally the only situation in which that logic applies.

If you want other people to investigate a crime, you either need proof of a crime, or you need people who will take your word for it. You have to have at least witnessed the crime. Otherwise, there's always the chance that you're investigating nothing.

ZalesMcMuffin ago

Of course there's the chance, if you don't know. But you can investigate a crime before proving that it occurred. It either did or did not occur. If it did not occur, then it cannot be investigated, because it is not real to be investigated. However, the appearance of a crime can be investigated, and a proper investigation will illuminate whether or not it did occur.

If a treasure is buried someplace, or if it isn't but you think that it is, you can dig for it. You don't have to prove it exists, or even know that it does, before digging. You can dig based on a hypothesis. The results will indicate whether or not your hypothesis was right.

If you find nothing, then your hypothesis was evidently wrong.

If you find the treasure, then you were digging for it prior to proving it was there. In the same way, if you investigate based on a suspicion of a crime and then establish, by the investigation, that the crime did occur, then you were investigating the crime prior to proving that it happened. QED

PizzaGateTwiceRetard ago

the appearance of a crime can be investigated, and a proper investigation will illuminate whether or not it did occur

Well, then, Pizzagate is a pretty poor investigation since you've all been at it for six months now and no proof of any crime has been uncovered.

If you find nothing, then your hypothesis was evidently wrong.

So, what's your deadline for admitting that you've found nothing?

Sorry, but if you want to claim that you're investigating a crime, then you need to have a crime to investigate. If it's taken this long to find a crime and you still haven't found a crime, you aren't actually investigating anything at all.

ZalesMcMuffin ago

As you well know, we aren't permitted to go beyond certain "lines", so it's absurd to insist that we have to produce the same results as those who are.

Frankly, that you say we've found no proof of anything is sufficient reason to end this discussion. The wiki and innumerable infographics await you if you want to look over what has been assembled.