Nine of 11 jurors at a press conference following the trial stated that they believed the children had been molested but the evidence did not allow them to state who had committed the abuse beyond a reasonable doubt. [28]
Hm. This must have been added somewhat recently (within the past few months). I read the whole wiki page a few months ago, and don't remember that being in there.
A pediatrician who examined the three child witnesses in the retrial of McMartin Pre-School defendant Ray Buckey testified this week that she found physical evidence of "blunt force penetrating trauma" consistent with sexual abuse in all three.
So there was actually evidence of abuse. I stand corrected on that. The question becomes separating the truth from the nonsense (I think we can agree no kids were flushed down toilets). I think logic suggests that IF a vast tunnel network under the school existed, its existence would have been conclusively confirmed when people went looking for it (not to mention how obvious any attempt to fill in such a tunnel system would have been). The question I have now is specifically how the claims of children being flown across the country to be abused by elites originated.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
Hm. This must have been added somewhat recently (within the past few months). I read the whole wiki page a few months ago, and don't remember that being in there.
So there was actually evidence of abuse. I stand corrected on that. The question becomes separating the truth from the nonsense (I think we can agree no kids were flushed down toilets). I think logic suggests that IF a vast tunnel network under the school existed, its existence would have been conclusively confirmed when people went looking for it (not to mention how obvious any attempt to fill in such a tunnel system would have been). The question I have now is specifically how the claims of children being flown across the country to be abused by elites originated.