i read this article today which i think everybody here should really read .
its written by Joel van der Reijden -- Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics (ISGP)
and this guy truelly knows his shit !
excerpt
On March 19, 2016 hackers manage to fool then Clinton campaign manager John Podesta into changing the password of his gmail account through a basic phishing email. By July it starts raining Podesta emails through Wikileaks, resulting in a number of minor scandals: ties of Clinton to Wall Street and a variety of journalists, shenanigans of the already controversial Clinton Foundation, and concrete evidence that Clinton and the Democratic Party elite purposely undermined Bernie Sanders, Clinton's chief rival for the Democratic nomination. [2] In other words, whoever was behind the hacking did a lot of good - and maybe should receive a Pulitzer Prize.
In an interesting development, the first few days of November 2016 - amidst continued releases of thousands upon thousands of Podesta emails by Wikileaks - saw the emergence of "Pizzagate" in the alternative media: the claim that words as "pizza" and "pasta" in the Podesta emails were used as code words to conceal trafficking and sexual abuse of children. Before we look at any origins or motives behind these claims, let's first see what exactly the evidence entails.
When we look at a number of cited Podesta emails in prominent Pizzagate video clips - such as PizzaGate Definitive Factcheck: Oh My God on the YouTube channel of David Seaman's, a former "liberal CIA" Huffington Post contributor - at first glance one indeed is tempted to think that they reveal a kind of code language surrounding the terms "pizza" and "pasta". However, being extensively familiar with the treacherous nature of disinformation, I checked all the citations in their full context on Wikileaks. As it turns out, all of them have very mundane explanations.
please read the whole article here.
view the rest of the comments →
sensitive ago
Ok, @fremar, I read the article. From day one, I had been on the lookout for convincing explanations why those Podesta emails are completely innocent. I haven't found one, and I have to admit, this one is worse than most others. The explanations in this article do the contrary for me.
fremar ago
i understand , but really the website where the article is posted is a really really good sourced database for childabusecases ,humantrafficking,etc, and there really exists a walnutsauce for example. and please read the other comments i posted. think. why the need from the people ? when you have supercomputers for years ?
sensitive ago
We all know the game: build a good reputation, then use this to spread disinfo, which people are likely to believe then. This article may be disinfo, or it is simply someone who cannot for the life of himself believe that PG is possible. I know there really exists a walnut sauce. Other "findings" may have innocent explanations as well. But I bet my life on it that many of them do not have an innocent explanation. And none of Podesta et al have come forward and explained them - you have to look at the bigger picture, then everything falls into place. And supercomputers may not be able to do what they need.
fremar ago
wrong supercomputers are really really really fast , also a government is always years ahead in devolopment of technology & controlling the masses . the person who wrote the article wrote allot of articles on that website , which is a very good researched based database fro childabuse , humantrafficking , corruption , etc. so this someone has no problems believing in the possibility of pg being real. you also have to look at the bigger picture .
sensitive ago
I do. And I always ask myself: cui bono?
fremar ago
not me lol i can assure you, when theres a need for true action ( protesting ), you would want me there