"deleting substantive discussions" --- Your post was opinion and conversation, not factual and not bringing new information which actually could lead to the action you want.
If you want pizza/pedogate to actually get results, then [we all have to] work on digging for info and pour the effort into it that it takes to write a substantive post that might help. I'm really sick to death of checking in on voat to see threads without actual leads/information upvoated like crazy in some ridiculous popularity contest, while "boring" posts with SERIOUS INFORMATION and GOOD LEADS are ignored and slid off the front page by ^^^^^^ unsubstantive content.
For example. Judicial Watch released new Huma Abedin emails today. That story got to the front of reddit. Here, it got maybe 13 votes. I think the pizzagate voat community should be ashamed of that. Mods should have every right to delete threads that don't contribute to the investigation. I do not envy them their position in having to both fight shills and then defend every decision they make - if they tread on ONE PERSON's feelings they are suddenly shills. And that creates an atmosphere where nothing can be deleted, which allows shills to slide the entire sub really badly.
We all need to get thicker skins. It's not about us, it's about the kids. Did your first post help the investigation? No? Then the mods were right to delete it.
If you are referring to the same corrupt authorities perpetrating these activities...
"They" will never prosecute this because "they" are the ones operating this as a business.
All of what you pointed out is evidence of this. That's why the Brian Podesta/NCMEC/ and Arun Rao/DOJ leads were so highly censored. Because the DOJ, child "protective" services and sources of authority which are supposed to prosecute these crimes ARE the ones perpetrating and orchestrating them.
Are you expecting them to willingly prosecute themselves? Why do you think an investigator got killed over the Franklin coverup when they had too much evidence?
The people in power have zero interest in "damaging evidence" beyond hiding it.
That is the reality. Now what are we going to do about it.
They have all the evidence. I think the problem is that all of the agencies and people who should be investigating this are part of the problem, and they doing everything they can to protect the human trafficking industry. What we must do is continue to spread the word in whatever ways we can, and raise public awareness of the situation until such time as the awareness reaches a critical mass. We need more numbers, and that takes time. We will cultivate patience and perseverance and continue the good fight.
view the rest of the comments →
throwaway345678 ago
"deleting substantive discussions" --- Your post was opinion and conversation, not factual and not bringing new information which actually could lead to the action you want.
If you want pizza/pedogate to actually get results, then [we all have to] work on digging for info and pour the effort into it that it takes to write a substantive post that might help. I'm really sick to death of checking in on voat to see threads without actual leads/information upvoated like crazy in some ridiculous popularity contest, while "boring" posts with SERIOUS INFORMATION and GOOD LEADS are ignored and slid off the front page by ^^^^^^ unsubstantive content.
For example. Judicial Watch released new Huma Abedin emails today. That story got to the front of reddit. Here, it got maybe 13 votes. I think the pizzagate voat community should be ashamed of that. Mods should have every right to delete threads that don't contribute to the investigation. I do not envy them their position in having to both fight shills and then defend every decision they make - if they tread on ONE PERSON's feelings they are suddenly shills. And that creates an atmosphere where nothing can be deleted, which allows shills to slide the entire sub really badly.
We all need to get thicker skins. It's not about us, it's about the kids. Did your first post help the investigation? No? Then the mods were right to delete it.
HereticalPeasant ago
Answer me this: Do they not already have all the damaging evidence they need given that we know:
a. Epstein mansion was heavily surveillanced with cameras everywhere. 26 visits by Bill Clinton and another 6-7 visits by Hillary Clinton.
B. Brownstone Operations
C. The materials on Anthony weenies laptop seen and saved by the NYPD and also currently in poession of the FBI
D. Surveillance capacity and the extensive minute by minute monitoring of the NSA
E. Vault 7 and the extent of the capacity of the CIA
F. DATTO Inc has all of Clintons "deleted" emails, regarding which a letter was addressed room FBI director James Comey.
WHAT THE FUCK MORE DO THEY NEED????????
throwaway345678 ago
If you are referring to the same corrupt authorities perpetrating these activities...
"They" will never prosecute this because "they" are the ones operating this as a business.
All of what you pointed out is evidence of this. That's why the Brian Podesta/NCMEC/ and Arun Rao/DOJ leads were so highly censored. Because the DOJ, child "protective" services and sources of authority which are supposed to prosecute these crimes ARE the ones perpetrating and orchestrating them.
Are you expecting them to willingly prosecute themselves? Why do you think an investigator got killed over the Franklin coverup when they had too much evidence?
The people in power have zero interest in "damaging evidence" beyond hiding it.
That is the reality. Now what are we going to do about it.
charmeuse ago
They have all the evidence. I think the problem is that all of the agencies and people who should be investigating this are part of the problem, and they doing everything they can to protect the human trafficking industry. What we must do is continue to spread the word in whatever ways we can, and raise public awareness of the situation until such time as the awareness reaches a critical mass. We need more numbers, and that takes time. We will cultivate patience and perseverance and continue the good fight.