You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

shachalnur ago

Yes it is,but they are losing.

So better ignore them or post a short ,clear debunk,in case you want to help new readers.

After a few days most readers know the basics and will recognize trolls themselves.

Don't let them upset you ,that's part of the Alinsky playbook,agit-prop stuff.

They'll get less vocal when time goes by and more proof comes out.

Focus on informing people and new readers,it's essential,ignore the shills.

Lonesome_Pizza ago

You're absolutely right, but my problem is that the shills are effectively sliding the forum whenever good information is produced and this will cause potential leads and useful information to be drowned out, before anybody can make any good use of the information. This is why we need more pizzagate subverses to divide the shill army, they'll have to navigate through multiple subverses to keep up with our information.

shachalnur ago

Use deduction.

The more shilling on a specific thread,the more uncomfortable the info is for David Brock's shill army.

I usually like to read threads with many shills because of that.

if there's really important stuff being buried in shilling ,you might try the following:

Gather all the relevant info from that thread and the comments,with copies to links to good comments ,and repost stating that this information attracted many shills.

It's a bit of work,but might attract more attention,and minimizes shill interference in geting the message through.