You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

anonOpenPress ago

I've beent thinking similary to OP, how to organize and what to do for the publicity. So far, things have been going on quite well - Everything done by now has forced the evil side to take hasty and bad moves, so at least let's keep up what we're doing already and let's not make any radical changes for those areas already working.

In organizing, we should keep in mind that trolls and shills are eager to join those organizations to mix/frustrate/mislead the work done. In a bigger scale (unorganized) they have less options for this, but of course the good side works slower without organizing. This is a difficult one. The children on top, I guess we could have some organizing to help them faster.

Reducing the troll/shill effect, one thing that might be helpful (in organized work) is to aim towards sharing clear claims, making sure in advance that there's no factual proof to debunk those claims. Another (maybe even better) way is to work towards great questions, demanding answers for those. Any false answers trying to debunk a valuable question are easy to recognize. Just my 2 cents. The OP's topic is valuable, thanks.

neverobey ago

Thanks for you 2 cents. I guess you are right about the derailing factor. AND: It's never good to let your enemy know what you are planning to do. Don't act, just think ! ;) So whatever I plan on doing, it should never be revealed somewhere. You are totally right.

anonOpenPress ago

A question I've been asking occasionally, so far left unanswered by any journalist, is:

"The pedophile bust in California in the end of January 2017 was the biggest in the nations history. What stopped it from entering the main stream media news?"

While left unanswered, this pretty much proofs the cover up in the media. News value for such a historical fact is huge.

neverobey ago

I was a journalist and political activist myself. I just can explain it from my point of view:

I stopped this job because I got frustrated how the whole business (in fact, that it is a business kind of is the problem itself :-) ) was all about incidents and lost the will to give context. Any article I wrote about connections between incidents was rejected by the editors, any article that tried to talk about "divide et impera" and that we would be distracted from the whole history, when I tried to raise some sympathy between political opponents …

It's just not wanted. I ended writing for MSM about a year ago. After taking a step outside the scene I noticed who everything had changed from being about information to being a sellable product. I am done with it. There is no use to it. It's another market in capitalism, nothing more.

I've lost some friends who still work for the media. They are caught in the bubble I was in. I can not blame them for not recognizing what they are doing.