So, I've been a long time lurker on Reddit and VOAT. I've had enough. I've had enough of being called a nutcase. I've had enough of the media swerving around every controversial piece of evidence in the case dealing with James Alefantis and #pedogate.
So, I am calling you out, James. I know you browse VOAT. I've seen the Pegasus video. We've all seen your Instagram. WE WANT ANSWERS.
Answers to this:
http://imgur.com/a/yeE4i
Why THE FUCK would you post a picture on Instagram with a guy wearing a "I love children shirt"? WHO THE FUCK DOES THAT?
Answers to this:
http://imgur.com/a/xxEze
Why is Prince Charles photographed with a KNOWN pedophile/necro?
http://imgur.com/a/v7ucm
Why is Prince Charles photographed with young children around him playing pingpong on YOUR CPP Facebook page?
http://imgur.com/a/KMZNH
WE WANT ANSWERS! DIRECT ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS. WHAT IS THE BACKGROUND?
How do you know Tony Podesta? How do you know Prince Charles? Aren't you just a lousy pizza shop owner? How do you know so many influential people with DIRECT ties to pedophilia and human trafficking?
Why do you say you hate kids when you hang out with people wearing obscene shirts? Where is your stance on RYAN, who directly called you out, making not only him, but his family libel?
Surely you know James.
view the rest of the comments →
KnightsofHubris ago
I retract nutcase. I'll subsitute not logical.
You still misunderstand what is going on here. The shirt relates to a specific person. Pierre Charles L'Enfant. He was an architect who designed the layout of Washington DC. There's a neighborhood named after him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Charles_L%27Enfant
All the grand spaces for the Washington Monument, the Lincoln Memorial, the US Capitol, the Smithsonian. He planned for this in the 1700s. he was a visionay. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/DC_mall_capitol.jpg/1920px-DC_mall_capitol.jpg
If you listen to the Michael Savage show, does that mean you like that guy or you support savagery?
You are obviously very emotional about this. But, you are not using proper skepticism or ratioanlism. you seem to believe some very dubious things, like if post a picture of Prince Charles or Hillary Clinton on my instagram I must know them. That's not skeptical at all.
Your logic is not the best.
Child trafficking rings are a proven fact. Yes. Members of high society have been proven to be involved with this rings? No. "these rings" That is too general. Some rings yes.
So therefore what? What conclusion do you draw from that?
Jimmy Savile was revealed to be a pedophile after he died. Jimmy Savile took a picture once with Prince Charles.
So your conclusion is that Prince Charles knew Jimmy Savile was a pedophile?
I used to watch the Cosby Show. Years later Cosby was revealed to have preyed on women. Was I celebrating that?
No. That is something called the hindsight fallacy. When you know the outcome of something and project that into the past and claim people should be aware of that outcome.
If you want to be a genuine skeptic, learn about logic, logical fallacies (common bad arguments we fall for) and cognitive biases (tricks our brain plays on us.)
1NationUnderAGroove ago
You should probably learn to use the search bar and do some reading, there is plenty of verified research and evidence on here, this whole subverse is pretty much based on the OP's questions..
Right now, you and your 1 month profile scream SHILL!!!