Main stream media claims this, based on... which investigations? Well, the investigation is exactly what we are demanding and now, according to them, it seems that one has already taken place. So where is it? And what were the results?
Let's have a peek from the point of view of the other side. MSM seems to base their claim mainly on two other claims: That AJ apologized, and that EMW pledged guilty. So this is their study? This debunks it all?
On the other hand, we claim that AJ was tricked/forced to do that or that he's simply fraud, and that EMW was a hired/forced actor on a false-flag attack. On AJ we have his whole history of publishing and additionally his latest claim (after apologizing) that the CPP was a false-flag in the first place, cover put up by NSA to distrack the investigation of pedogate. On EMW, we have a list of supporting theories.
Looking VERY OBJECTIVELY, our claims are about 70-80% stronger than what MSM ever had. Based on this... MSM's are debunking themselves! The fact that MSM has not taken ANY of our claims under investigation, or searched for any objective investigation on any of those, makes this 100% clear.
What is so great is that by doing like this, MSM is actually... proving pedogate!
(and we don't need to trust neither AJ nor EMW flags/frauds to see that. We only need to showcase the level of journalism.)
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Don't forget about "settled." As in "settled science." Yeah, they can't get a Nor'Easter right. We are supposed to believe them about global warming?