I was thinking about all of the industries that have been called out during the lifespan of #pizza(pedo)gate. Hollywood, the political elite, shipping, child care, missing or exploited children's charities, delivery services, tourism, and pizza (restaurant) businesses have all been in the spotlight with us. There is one "industry" that has not really been focused on that is based upon exploitation, has the equipment and distribution system to deliver the finished product and can easily launder funds (I really have no clue how they actually make money). I am talking about pornography.
This "industry" is all about exploitation and is it not believable that they could move a step further and do the same to children? Pornography is free to all on the internet. I understand there is some revenue stream associated with data collection and advertisements but is that enough to churn out on a constant basis. There has been a closing lately associated with a large ex-military structure in San Francisco that was for BDSM and such that lamented the lack of revenue because of the ready availability. These people do some unbelievable sick stuff "legally" that can easily translate to other illegal activities. I also believe that a lot of these poor girls (and boys) are probably trafficked into the life (maybe through the same channels highlighted by the recent Dr. Phil episode). This would be a good way to unload a lot of people without bodies stacking up.
Another way pornography helps sex trafficking is in creating a market for it. We have seen how Hollywood normalizes otherwise abhorent behavior to dismiss any objections to it's happening in real life. We have that same phenomenon with pornography. You have to wonder where they get all these beautiful 18 year old girls that are willing to do what is required in that business (I obviously, with no real proof, believe these are girls that have been sexually abused since birth, are still "owned," and can be trusted to perform in a way that doesn't shine a light on their upbringing). And that it creates the mindset among men that these kind of girls are common only serves to further their aims of the perpetrators of #pizza(pedo)gate.
I have no clue how to investigate that and am reluctant to because pornography is a weakness for me and I don't know how to look up and investigate the companies without stumbling across the "product." I understand the "not your personal army" attitude, but I think that a lot of links between what has been investigated so far and pornography can be found by the right person. Just a thought. Thanks for taking the time to read this.
view the rest of the comments →
Searching4Truth ago
I disagree with the kink.com San Francisco Armory being involved in any way with pedophilia. I lived in SF for over a decade and have many friends that work for the company. It is a very professional studio space with lovely employees. Do not demonize consensual S&M and fetish experimentation. Human sexuality is ultimately a positive thing if you aren't hurting anyone. Especially children. Once we cross that line then start to call it out.
shooglenifty ago
I was saying that kink.com doesn't make enough money to cover their costs. How are these companies covering expenses when their product is free to anyone who wishes to use it? Kink going under may prove your point about being technically legal, but what of the others?