Yes, it's been a busy weekend for Pizzagate. Here is a think-out-loud piece for you...

So I posted this article in The New American earlier, and reading it got me thinking about this. Read this paragraph:

"Since the hackers would then have remote access control over any such device, all files and folders would be available to the hacker. Worse yet, having control of the device would also allow the hacker to either remove or add files and folders. If the hacker wanted to bring an adversary down, it would be a simple matter to create a hidden folder containing illegal files — including child pornography — on the victim’s device to be “discovered” at a later date by investigators serving a warrant. Such a sting operation would look — for all the world — like a legitimate law-enforcement activity. Even if it did not end in a prosecution and prison, the victim could be branded for life. After all, this is almost exactly what happened to former CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. In her case, the hidden files that were secretly placed on her computer were classified government documents for which Atkisson could have been charged under the Espionage Act for possessing."

So there you have it - using the Vault 7 tools, it is now possible to undetectably load files on to pretty much anyone's PC. So now, a lawyer can pretty much claim that "My client in no way has any knowledge how this snuff film of a four year old child got on to his computer. Someone must have remotely planted it there. I mean, look at the Wikileaks revelations about the tools that are now available to do just that kind of thing!"

The FBI already had to back off from a previous case because they didn't want to reveal that they had this kind of technology. From the same article:

*"If the desire is to arrest and prosecute those who frequent child pornography sites, one might reasonably expect the agency to press on — even in the face of legal challenges — to get those convictions, right? Well, that all depends.

'When the lawyer representing Jay Michaud, a school administrator from Vancouver, Washington, challenged the government’s case against his client, demanding to see the source code for the hack the FBI alleges led agents to his client, the government dropped the case. According to a report by ZDNet from March 6:

'The FBI used a "network investigative technique" — a hacking tool that in any other hands than the feds would be considered malware — to deanonymize the users of the Tor browser, a widely used app for easy access to the dark web, during its 2015 investigation into the website.

'Little is known about the hacking tool, but it was known to be able to gather real-world information on Playpen visitors, such as IP addresses — details of which should have been protected by Tor.

'But the government refused to reveal the full source code of the exploit in court, and so the judge tossed out the evidence, rendering a significant set-back to the government's case." *

But that was back in 2015, before Pizzagate broke. But NOW, with the prospect of upper level people getting indicted, it would make sense that they would leak that they have the tools to undetectably load files on to anyone's computer. Then the pedo's lawyers can claim that they are victims of a political revenge plot or a competitor wanted to bring them down, or whatever.

And recall we have already had Clapper floating the idea that "Russians" might have planted child pornography on American's computers. But now it is KNOWN that this kind of technology actually exists, even if it was developed by Americans for Americans. (Oh the IRONY!!!)

Oh yes, the FBI or some other alphabet org would continue to feign like they don't want to admit that they have these tools. But now that it is public knowledge, they would have to "acquiesce" and "begrudgingly admit" that they indeed have this capability, and it is "feasible" that the pedo could indeed have been compromised by someone else. I guess I would look for this kind of scenario to play out.