Now we can talk about those related to Epstein, Sandusky, Hastert, Saville and the recent busts but we can't talk about Comet, Alefantis, Podesta and any of their possible connections because well, there is nothing to see there. See? So, there aren't any weirdo baby pictures, with suggestive commentary about murder and shit. There isn't any of that really. It's completely normal. See? There aren't any suspicious businesses around either who happen to use pedo logos. Nope. Just a honey pot really. So you see, we shouldn't go there. Nothing to really investigate. No real relevant connections that would suggest an interest in children. And, well, we can't bust the DC ring you see. That one is untouchable and I have to back off now. But look over here, look, look. Nothing to see there....look over here.....there's nothing to seeeee....look over here....super male vitaliteee
view the rest of the comments →
justice4kidz ago
the only thing that needed to be cleared up is this: we generally do not believe a child sex ring was run OUT of comet pizza. that is the only thing that needs to be retracted. also, if there was child porn downloaded form comet's website, this would be critical to verify. but the only one who knows is Titus Frost. what was the password protected portion of the website for? as a programmer, this is generally only for uploading and downloading files. or a private chat. so I don't think Comet or Alefantis are "innocent", especially after threatening Ryan Alexander o Neal's LIFE on text messages!!!! about Pegasus Museum! what the bleep is he hiding there ??? innocent until proven guilty, but, obviously no investigation will ever take place because he was super protected. (alefantis is)
V____Z ago
There is no "generally". NO ONE ever claimed this before the NYT. This is a pretty good piece debunking the NYT, i've copied it below. But I can attest that I have had my ear to the ground since the very beginning of pizzagate and Cecilia King from the NYT was absolutely the FIRST person/time I ever heard pizzagate believers defined in such a way.
I personally asked her to please share her source for the contention that we believe Hillary Clinton ran the ring. I was next going to ask for her source for "out of the basement of Comet" - but she ignored my first request so i gave up on her. It turns out she went from reporting on computer stuff to suddenly writing this piece about PG. NYT works for the Rothschilds.
Fact Checking The New York Times’ Fact Checker
While we can’t speak for every Pizzagate article on the internet, we here at TNN never accused Hillary Clinton herself of child tracking or “molesting children at Comet,” nor do we condone, encourage or participate in threats. And, unlike the NYT, we don’t summarily rubber stamp as “facts” the statements made in press releases or by establishment officials and their cronies.
Here’s how we envision the extent of the Times’ fact checking:
REPORTER: Hi, this is Cecilia Kang from The New York Times. My editor, who is friends with John Podesta, told me to call you about some silly online conspiracy theory that you and Hillary Clinton are trafficking children in the back room of your pizza parlor. So are you?
COMET PIZZA: No. You can only order pizza.
REPORTER: Okay, great. Feel free to send me an email with your comments about how this conspiracy theory is affecting your business. We will send a photographer over to get a promotional image. Thank you. Bye.
comet-pizza-reviewIt is a straw man logical fallacy to write that conspiracy theorists claim Hillary herself hangs out at Comet Pizza and molests children in the back rooms. TNN has looked into the Pizzagate matter quite deeply, and nowhere that we can find does anyone make such a claim in a serious manner.
The NYT apparently expects that the establishment would conduct such activities daily and out in the open for all dining patrons to witness. Rather, if there are pedophile activities, they are alluded to with strange images and coded language.
The NYT claims that the hideous photos of children circulated on Instagram under Alefantis’ screen name “jimmycomet” are of customers and “friends.” If this is the case — which we doubt — then there should be a serious child protection or social service investigation as well.
samhara ago
They do that all the time. It's a typical strategy.
They called the W. Bush campaign to ask them if they stole the election.