Putin Bans U.S. Adoption Of Russian Orphans Due To Pedophile Epidemic
BY IWB
· MARCH 24, 2017
http://investmentwatchblog.com/putin-bans-u-s-adoption-of-russian-orphans-due-to-pedophile-epidemic/
by Baxter Dmitry
Vladimir Putin has issued an immediate ban on U.S. adults adopting Russian children over fears for the safety of the children due to the pedophilia epidemic plaguing the United States.
The law, which was passed emphatically by both houses of the Duma, raised eyebrows in Russia, however Putin explained “the country will not be responsible” for the abuse of their children at the hands of pedophiles.
Americans adopt children from abroad more often that citizens of any other country in the world, and while the vast majority may have honorable intentions, there is increasing evidence that an elite pedophile ring uses adoption to enter children into child sex trafficking, with many of the children disappearing without a trace.
D.C. children most at risk
The elite pedophile ring operating out of Washington D.C. has made children living in the nation’s capital the most “at risk” in the country, according to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services data, with an astonishing 23.4 per 1,000 children suffering abuse. The next closest is New York, another known elite pedophile hub, with 17.4 cases per 1,000 children.
Despite the disturbing statistics, Putin’s ban on adoption to the United States has been seen as controversial in some quarters. The President tried to explain himself in front of a hall full of Russian and foreign journalists, many of whom were surprised by the adoption bill.
view the rest of the comments →
AeroHammer ago
Stop spreading disinfo, it hurts the cause. Read the articles and check the sources before jumping to post it. Read the link from the article hyperlinked in "immediate ban"
ASolo ago
I've reviewed both, while the NY Times article does not cite Putin directly referencing Washington DC I believe the author of the above article citing U.S. Department of Health and Human Services data in his own article is correct. There's nothing disinformational about that, it's called journalism.