He did launch fulcrum news, so Dave is leveraging the platform he has to secure a separate stream of news and revenue. He is talented no doubt, and he'd make a ton of money reporting on the PJW and Alex Jones world news than he does talking about pizzagate which gets his videos instantly de-monetized and forces him to beg for money.
There are more lucrative things for him to be doing with his time. Paul Joseph Watson has almost 900k followers,and far more cash. IF he discussed pizzagate that would vanish (the cash, not the followers).
view the rest of the comments →
Yuke ago
We have, as I see it, three groups:
1.) The genuine Pizzagate researchers.
2.) The Shills
3.) The ones that 'pretend' to be on the side of the Pizzagate researchers, but are actually out for their own means.
As I see it, if you ask for money, in any part of this, you are either number two or you're number three; you are certainly not number one!
Conclude as you will. My thoughts on anyone trying to be a central figure regarding this, I've said many times.
VieBleu ago
I would like to see a whole lot of people who make a living just exposing pizzapedogate - that would mean there is broad support for this cause!
Making money is not a problem, intention is everything. Making money does not automatically equal bad intentions.
watchersonthewall ago
He did launch fulcrum news, so Dave is leveraging the platform he has to secure a separate stream of news and revenue. He is talented no doubt, and he'd make a ton of money reporting on the PJW and Alex Jones world news than he does talking about pizzagate which gets his videos instantly de-monetized and forces him to beg for money.
There are more lucrative things for him to be doing with his time. Paul Joseph Watson has almost 900k followers,and far more cash. IF he discussed pizzagate that would vanish (the cash, not the followers).