There are several extremely important conclusions and lessons to be learned from the Alex Jones recorded legal retraction. And you're unlikely to learn or benefit from any of them by getting your knickers in a twist. First and foremost : the only thing solidly "proven" by any of it so far is that AJ has a good lawyer who can weasel-word with the best of 'em. No good retraction actually "retracts" anything, and this gets an A+ in that regard. Secondly (and almost as important) is that the very fact of doing it at all, AT THIS VERY LATE DATE, is nicely timed confirmation that James Alefantis and co-offenders are STILL so worried about the progress of the pizzagate investigation that they are leaning on Jones with heavy and significant legal threats. That is NOT normal and accepted practice for down-playing a scandal that has run its course. The only explanation (that makes any sense) for re-igniting the issue so publicly (with a news worthy "event" which gives the press a reason and excuse for giving it fresh coverage) is that they actually DO fear the prospect of going to jail as a very REAL possibility. WHICH LEADS ME TO THE FINAL POINT : Alefantis , by threatening Jones with legal action, has handed pizzagate investigators/supporters a fantastic opportunity on a silver platter. They have handed us, for free!, A NEWSWORTHY CONTROVERSEY that can now be used as the foundation for tons of coverage. USE IT! Manna from heaven! It breathes new life into a campaign that has been sorely lacking in HARD, NEWSWORTHY, EVENTS. You do get the picture here, right? If you absolutely have to attack Alex Jones (for personal psychological reasons) then AT LEAST do so in a manner that 1) carries the pizzagate message 2) exposes the terror of guilt-ridden perps in high places, and 3) BOOSTS the viewership of Jones' web site... because the controversey itself is a great way to CARRY the story you need to disseminate. It us like a "wave" that you then surf. The bigger the wave the better. For example , instead of ripping him up with personal insults SYMPATHIZE with how this lonely standard bearer has been forced to buckle under by powerful and corrupted GUILTY pedophiles. It's okay to critcize his capitulation, but the emphasis is on pedogate and pedophiles and Alefantis , not on Jones. Milk the story, team, these kinds of opportunity don't drop into your lap from a benevolent heaven all that often. Don't waste it.
Great points man, thank you! I agree completely. And all these people saying Jones sold us out, that this proves he's disinfo, etc. are ridiculous. This cabal comes after you, your livelihood, and your children, and from behind their keyboards they act like tough guys who would refuse to cooperate. Yeah right.
He wasn't shut down years ago because he's too theatrical/over the top to be taken seriously by most people. He's easy to discredit with stuff like talking about humanoid frog people in glass cases, so he really wasn't seen as an immediate threat. He's the poster boy for "conspiracy wacko," which to the majority, makes him not worth giving a second glance. Ironically, it's these theatrics that make him fun to watch and expanded his audience to certain people, just not people considered influencers by the elite.
view the rest of the comments →
hardrock ago
Listen Up Please !
There are several extremely important conclusions and lessons to be learned from the Alex Jones recorded legal retraction. And you're unlikely to learn or benefit from any of them by getting your knickers in a twist. First and foremost : the only thing solidly "proven" by any of it so far is that AJ has a good lawyer who can weasel-word with the best of 'em. No good retraction actually "retracts" anything, and this gets an A+ in that regard. Secondly (and almost as important) is that the very fact of doing it at all, AT THIS VERY LATE DATE, is nicely timed confirmation that James Alefantis and co-offenders are STILL so worried about the progress of the pizzagate investigation that they are leaning on Jones with heavy and significant legal threats. That is NOT normal and accepted practice for down-playing a scandal that has run its course. The only explanation (that makes any sense) for re-igniting the issue so publicly (with a news worthy "event" which gives the press a reason and excuse for giving it fresh coverage) is that they actually DO fear the prospect of going to jail as a very REAL possibility. WHICH LEADS ME TO THE FINAL POINT : Alefantis , by threatening Jones with legal action, has handed pizzagate investigators/supporters a fantastic opportunity on a silver platter. They have handed us, for free!, A NEWSWORTHY CONTROVERSEY that can now be used as the foundation for tons of coverage. USE IT! Manna from heaven! It breathes new life into a campaign that has been sorely lacking in HARD, NEWSWORTHY, EVENTS. You do get the picture here, right? If you absolutely have to attack Alex Jones (for personal psychological reasons) then AT LEAST do so in a manner that 1) carries the pizzagate message 2) exposes the terror of guilt-ridden perps in high places, and 3) BOOSTS the viewership of Jones' web site... because the controversey itself is a great way to CARRY the story you need to disseminate. It us like a "wave" that you then surf. The bigger the wave the better. For example , instead of ripping him up with personal insults SYMPATHIZE with how this lonely standard bearer has been forced to buckle under by powerful and corrupted GUILTY pedophiles. It's okay to critcize his capitulation, but the emphasis is on pedogate and pedophiles and Alefantis , not on Jones. Milk the story, team, these kinds of opportunity don't drop into your lap from a benevolent heaven all that often. Don't waste it.
JeremiahSinclair ago
Great points man, thank you! I agree completely. And all these people saying Jones sold us out, that this proves he's disinfo, etc. are ridiculous. This cabal comes after you, your livelihood, and your children, and from behind their keyboards they act like tough guys who would refuse to cooperate. Yeah right.
equineluvr ago
If AJ has been "exposing" the criminal cabal all along, then he would have been shut down YEARS AGO!!
JeremiahSinclair ago
He wasn't shut down years ago because he's too theatrical/over the top to be taken seriously by most people. He's easy to discredit with stuff like talking about humanoid frog people in glass cases, so he really wasn't seen as an immediate threat. He's the poster boy for "conspiracy wacko," which to the majority, makes him not worth giving a second glance. Ironically, it's these theatrics that make him fun to watch and expanded his audience to certain people, just not people considered influencers by the elite.