You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

catslovejustice ago

Oh my gosh, you said what I have been thinking and said it very eloquently!! I totally agree. We can't be making accusations against people if we do not have 100% proof especially when it involves someone's "good name". Also, I would like to vent a little to the pedo accusers on social media. It really pisses me off when people who have been blessed with a really large following and have the power to influence, fritter it away by getting booted off social media for antagonizing powerful individuals and accusing them of crimes when there is not 100% proof. Don't get me wrong, I realize some people got booted off for no good reason, but I am specifically talking about the people who use their social media platform to troll. I would like to see people use their social media to focus on red pilling as many as they can. Don't risk a large following by poking bears. Use it to get as many people woke as possible. The victims need woke people. Why don't victims come forward? BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID NO ONE WILL BELIEVE THEM. That is what happened in the Franklin Case and the McMartin Case. We need as many people woke to encourage victims to come forward.

equineluvr ago

No, we don't need "100% proof." "100% proof" of pedophilia would be a VIDEOTAPE of the perp committing the act.

Even the court doesn't require that standard.

matheasysolutions ago

It appears a videotape may be the only way to get these people in prison... #corruptlawenforcement

Mad_As_Hell ago

Even then, "uh the Russians photoshopped my face into a CP video"