Some quick reading shows Darkmath’s very first VOAT submission was this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1453292 titled John Podesta and deleted emails. The question is, would Darkmath shine a spotlight on what is arguably the most sensitive and potentially damaging evidence that JP may have had involvement in McCann’s disappearance if he was a so called shill? The PG puzzle is so complex that the probability there will be universal agreement on all aspects by everyone is obviously zero, yet anyone who dissents on anything is at risk of being labeled a shill. If the OP is sincere in intent, it’s recklessness of a high order, but I suspect otherwise. Of his posts that have run into, I find myself disagreeing with Darkmath’s ideas at times, but on the whole, his leaning is obvious. If you want to claim someone’s a shill, at least have the temerity to post all those specific examples from their comment history that supports your case. I would wager the OP cannot muster three good examples.
Hmmm... member for one month, with one submission and one comment? I regret dignifying the OP with any response before reading member history. There is a minimum amount of content expected from VOAT members in order to qualify one to even make such a claim, and AltrightPsyOp is not remotely there. In fact, the nature of his first post betrays intent to a degree that is silly.
view the rest of the comments →
rwb ago
Some quick reading shows Darkmath’s very first VOAT submission was this: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1453292 titled John Podesta and deleted emails. The question is, would Darkmath shine a spotlight on what is arguably the most sensitive and potentially damaging evidence that JP may have had involvement in McCann’s disappearance if he was a so called shill? The PG puzzle is so complex that the probability there will be universal agreement on all aspects by everyone is obviously zero, yet anyone who dissents on anything is at risk of being labeled a shill. If the OP is sincere in intent, it’s recklessness of a high order, but I suspect otherwise. Of his posts that have run into, I find myself disagreeing with Darkmath’s ideas at times, but on the whole, his leaning is obvious. If you want to claim someone’s a shill, at least have the temerity to post all those specific examples from their comment history that supports your case. I would wager the OP cannot muster three good examples.
rwb ago
Hmmm... member for one month, with one submission and one comment? I regret dignifying the OP with any response before reading member history. There is a minimum amount of content expected from VOAT members in order to qualify one to even make such a claim, and AltrightPsyOp is not remotely there. In fact, the nature of his first post betrays intent to a degree that is silly.