I think we have a running list of all the arrests that have been made regarding child trafficking and members of local, state, and federal government. I'd be willing to entertain your notion a lot better if you'd provide more evidence than, I guess, the nothingness that you have brought here today. Come back with some evidence that proves its falsehood and I'd be very willing to discuss it with you. Until then, nothing you say is taken seriously here. I mean, yeah, I'm replying, but I should make it clear that you have not swayed my standing in the least. You need more evidence to do that. Peace and love. God bless you and God bless America.
I think we have a running list of all the arrests that have been made regarding child trafficking
I think you have some false claims about a child trafficking arrests spike since Trump took office that were being published on fake news websites. And I also think that child trafficking arrests have absolutely nothing to do with your ridiculous and stupid conspiracy theory, and taking credit for it is simply pathetic. Also when an insane conspiratard like yourself pretends that he values and understands evidence is always cringe worthy.
Feel free to sling insults. I'm familiar with that tactic. Continuing to produce no evidence to support your claim and continuing to slander the people not the act. There is no doubt in my mind that there is something here. You may feel free to disbelieve that all you want or are told to, but keep in mind that I am the "crazy" one yet I am also the one attempting to have a civil discussion. I watched this tactic throughout the 2016 election, and I watched this tactic on just about every political front in the last, probably, 6 years. And it's why (what I would assume to be) your candidate lost the election. Your vicious attitude toward factual paper trails and analysis of thousands of Wikileaks files and articles leads me to conclude that you are either ignorant to the facts or being coerced in some way to oppose the investigation. Either way, I'm uninterested in continuing communication with you. If you would like to further discuss this topic, I would invite you to do about 3 more months of research on this topic and then come and tell me that our findings are baseless. I'll be waiting very patiently for you.
P.S. If need be, you may submit your ideas to me through a PowerPoint presentation.
view the rest of the comments →
palmitespo910 ago
Okay. God bless you and your shillblue paycheck. <3
And by the way...my imaginary friend will definitely remember which side you were on. I'm not worried on my end.
PG_IsStupidAsFuck3 ago
You know that my "shillblue paycheck" is as non existent as your imaginary friend? or as the incoming pizzagate arrests?
palmitespo910 ago
I think we have a running list of all the arrests that have been made regarding child trafficking and members of local, state, and federal government. I'd be willing to entertain your notion a lot better if you'd provide more evidence than, I guess, the nothingness that you have brought here today. Come back with some evidence that proves its falsehood and I'd be very willing to discuss it with you. Until then, nothing you say is taken seriously here. I mean, yeah, I'm replying, but I should make it clear that you have not swayed my standing in the least. You need more evidence to do that. Peace and love. God bless you and God bless America.
PG_IsStupidAsFuck3 ago
I think you have some false claims about a child trafficking arrests spike since Trump took office that were being published on fake news websites. And I also think that child trafficking arrests have absolutely nothing to do with your ridiculous and stupid conspiracy theory, and taking credit for it is simply pathetic. Also when an insane conspiratard like yourself pretends that he values and understands evidence is always cringe worthy.
palmitespo910 ago
Feel free to sling insults. I'm familiar with that tactic. Continuing to produce no evidence to support your claim and continuing to slander the people not the act. There is no doubt in my mind that there is something here. You may feel free to disbelieve that all you want or are told to, but keep in mind that I am the "crazy" one yet I am also the one attempting to have a civil discussion. I watched this tactic throughout the 2016 election, and I watched this tactic on just about every political front in the last, probably, 6 years. And it's why (what I would assume to be) your candidate lost the election. Your vicious attitude toward factual paper trails and analysis of thousands of Wikileaks files and articles leads me to conclude that you are either ignorant to the facts or being coerced in some way to oppose the investigation. Either way, I'm uninterested in continuing communication with you. If you would like to further discuss this topic, I would invite you to do about 3 more months of research on this topic and then come and tell me that our findings are baseless. I'll be waiting very patiently for you.
P.S. If need be, you may submit your ideas to me through a PowerPoint presentation.