No, you are not the only one.
The British hoax is a poorly done psyop for the purpose of inciting fear and throwing the sheep into a panic, and yes, getting the Dr. Phil show off the top news.
My friends in London know full well it is bogus. All the signs are there: most secure area in London accessed by gov operatives, faces of 'cops' blurred out, no medical protocols followed, a drill (dress rehearsal) in the days prior, and as with other such hoaxes, the news channels are instantly in contact with "relatives"--how did they find them? They were not there and have not heard from injured 'victims' or even what hospital they are in, but have updated FaKebook pages withing seconds, and supply the Daily Mail with dozens of photos.
Another hint is varying "eyewitness accounts by those who saw nothing whatsoever, but heard shots [sic] screaming, running etc. which proves nothing.
Reuters (Rothschild owned news source since they founded it in the nineteenth century) instantly on the scene taking staged photos which show no trauma, but do show the obligatory masonic shoe missing trope, and odd (manikin) poses, with no medical aid being given and less fake blood and moulage (almost none) than the Boston hoaxathon.
Then the car is rammed head on into a fence, and a policeman is stabbed through body armor but none of the dozens of police in the area can do anything. A photo of a perfectly clean knife on the ground is supposedly proof.
Most importantly, ask yourself why anyone would want to run over ordinary people--how does that advance any cause whatsoever? Cui Bono?
And who decided this is a "terrorist attack'? People run over pedestrians on sidewalks in Florida just about every week because they are simply bad drivers.
Doesn't anyone recall vault 7 about their ability to take over a car and crash it? How do you think Princess Diana's car crashed into the 13th pillar, then turned and hit the opposite wall? Or any of the other mysteriously odd deaths by car that have happened, such as Michael Hastings?
It was also the anniversary of Belgian airport hoax which was thoroughly debunked, that was done to distract sheep from investigating pedos over there.
And finally 3/22 skull and bones etc. It's getting boring really.
Very good thoughts. You're right, it's getting to the point where these hoaxes are so frequent and so goofy that only people who almost entirely lack critical thinking skills can believe them.
I actually copied and pasted your comment into a Reddit thread (didn't take credit for it of course) today, because I thought you summed it up and nailed it so well. I even read it to my fiancee because it's such a good summary. I think you would enjoy this video. This guy Ole Dammegard basically predicted that a terror attack would take place at Westminster based on clues in previous false flags.
I don't mind if you take credit or not. It's the idea that needs to get out.
You might be interested to know that this hoax has been completely taken apart and more info to debunk it is surfacing.
Two of my favorites:
1) They leisurely take the "perp", whose various names are legion at this point, by gurney past half a dozen ambulances and into a the Marriott Westminster Hotel lobby, rather than to the hospital which is directly across the street. They tried to edit the film so it looks like an ambulance took off but it was an epic fail. (Also note that the hotel from which a part of the Nice truck hoax was filmed with a potato was the Westminster Hotel on the Riviera.) Here's one video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3l5gztIPaA
2) The woman who allegedly jumped from the bridge did so only after the car was past her and there was no other car nearby. This, according to their own released footage. The video I saw this on has been "removed" but may have showed up on another channel.
I believe the reason for these hoaxes is to keep the sheep from looking at the pedos in high places, or what is really going on the world; hence their indirect relevance to pizzagate.
I have followed the work of Ole Dammegard since I heard of him from Peekay Truth.
Ok. I really think this needs to be its own submission - would you mind if I did a submission on this? Or if you want to that's great. But if you don't feel like it I'll write it and put this conversation up. This is the title I was thinking of - what do you think?
Coincidence or Circomstantial Evidence? - The London Attack Pulls Dr. Phil's Sex Trafficking Show Off The Air On The East Coast
It may just be in my area, I don't think the show airs at the same time in every market, but either way it is a huge distraction from a huge pedogate acknowledgement
I found this online - is this accurate for you? "Dr. Phil comes on twice a day here. I am on the east coast. He comes on at 5-6 p.m. and then 11:p.m. here on Channel 3 during the week."
view the rest of the comments →
nitro169 ago
Am I the only one crazy enough to think the british are so deep into this they may have planned a terrorist attack to block its viewing?
https://imgur.com/tUekAqK
Laskar ago
No, you are not the only one. The British hoax is a poorly done psyop for the purpose of inciting fear and throwing the sheep into a panic, and yes, getting the Dr. Phil show off the top news. My friends in London know full well it is bogus. All the signs are there: most secure area in London accessed by gov operatives, faces of 'cops' blurred out, no medical protocols followed, a drill (dress rehearsal) in the days prior, and as with other such hoaxes, the news channels are instantly in contact with "relatives"--how did they find them? They were not there and have not heard from injured 'victims' or even what hospital they are in, but have updated FaKebook pages withing seconds, and supply the Daily Mail with dozens of photos. Another hint is varying "eyewitness accounts by those who saw nothing whatsoever, but heard shots [sic] screaming, running etc. which proves nothing.
Reuters (Rothschild owned news source since they founded it in the nineteenth century) instantly on the scene taking staged photos which show no trauma, but do show the obligatory masonic shoe missing trope, and odd (manikin) poses, with no medical aid being given and less fake blood and moulage (almost none) than the Boston hoaxathon.
Then the car is rammed head on into a fence, and a policeman is stabbed through body armor but none of the dozens of police in the area can do anything. A photo of a perfectly clean knife on the ground is supposedly proof. Most importantly, ask yourself why anyone would want to run over ordinary people--how does that advance any cause whatsoever? Cui Bono?
And who decided this is a "terrorist attack'? People run over pedestrians on sidewalks in Florida just about every week because they are simply bad drivers.
Doesn't anyone recall vault 7 about their ability to take over a car and crash it? How do you think Princess Diana's car crashed into the 13th pillar, then turned and hit the opposite wall? Or any of the other mysteriously odd deaths by car that have happened, such as Michael Hastings? It was also the anniversary of Belgian airport hoax which was thoroughly debunked, that was done to distract sheep from investigating pedos over there. And finally 3/22 skull and bones etc. It's getting boring really.
blackguard19 ago
Very good thoughts. You're right, it's getting to the point where these hoaxes are so frequent and so goofy that only people who almost entirely lack critical thinking skills can believe them.
Laskar ago
Thanks so much for your reply, I am glad someone out there is awake. You nailed it when you said they lack critical thinking skills.
blackguard19 ago
I actually copied and pasted your comment into a Reddit thread (didn't take credit for it of course) today, because I thought you summed it up and nailed it so well. I even read it to my fiancee because it's such a good summary. I think you would enjoy this video. This guy Ole Dammegard basically predicted that a terror attack would take place at Westminster based on clues in previous false flags.
Laskar ago
I don't mind if you take credit or not. It's the idea that needs to get out.
You might be interested to know that this hoax has been completely taken apart and more info to debunk it is surfacing.
Two of my favorites: 1) They leisurely take the "perp", whose various names are legion at this point, by gurney past half a dozen ambulances and into a the Marriott Westminster Hotel lobby, rather than to the hospital which is directly across the street. They tried to edit the film so it looks like an ambulance took off but it was an epic fail. (Also note that the hotel from which a part of the Nice truck hoax was filmed with a potato was the Westminster Hotel on the Riviera.) Here's one video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3l5gztIPaA
2) The woman who allegedly jumped from the bridge did so only after the car was past her and there was no other car nearby. This, according to their own released footage. The video I saw this on has been "removed" but may have showed up on another channel.
I believe the reason for these hoaxes is to keep the sheep from looking at the pedos in high places, or what is really going on the world; hence their indirect relevance to pizzagate.
I have followed the work of Ole Dammegard since I heard of him from Peekay Truth.
Laskar ago
Thanks.
V____Z ago
There also the news that Trump was indeed being spied on, so this attack does come in handy.
nitro169 ago
I live on the east coast and minutes into this broadcast it was interrupted by the london attack, and the network never returned to the show...
VieBleu ago
Are you saying you experienced the Dr. Phil show sex trafficking episode actually interrupted on the East Coast by news of the London attack?
I just want to make sure I am understanding you right because that is pretty important.
nitro169 ago
Yeah, it was like 5 minutes into the show then "breaking news"
VieBleu ago
Ok. I really think this needs to be its own submission - would you mind if I did a submission on this? Or if you want to that's great. But if you don't feel like it I'll write it and put this conversation up. This is the title I was thinking of - what do you think?
Coincidence or Circomstantial Evidence? - The London Attack Pulls Dr. Phil's Sex Trafficking Show Off The Air On The East Coast
nitro169 ago
It may just be in my area, I don't think the show airs at the same time in every market, but either way it is a huge distraction from a huge pedogate acknowledgement
VieBleu ago
I found this online - is this accurate for you? "Dr. Phil comes on twice a day here. I am on the east coast. He comes on at 5-6 p.m. and then 11:p.m. here on Channel 3 during the week."