Actually... if it was a legitimate heart attack, I don't want to wish anyone harm. He's a twisted man conducting some very shady shit when it comes to disinformation - but that shouldn't carry a death sentence. On the flipside, if it was an orchestrated effort to silence him for some reason, I would also feel bad... as this would indicate he was willing to share much needed information.
Any of the "elite" or even their assistants that pass away limits the investigatory strength that could be flexed within future investigations.
How am I defending him you fucktard? I am simply stating what I've been stating the entire time... we need evidence to truly persecute those involved and put boots to throats (assuming the legal system fails us... which it very well may, even with evidence in-hand). Rushing to judgement of anyone with pitchforks and fires at the stakes is not a wise direction to move this.
Imagine for a moment if you will... CNN decides to stroll on to Voat and sees a comment like the one below: "killing them is maybe the best thing." That is a stupid thing to say. It erodes the seriousness of this by jumping to a conclusion that would end with someone being extinguished without having proper evidence.
So, instead of wasting our time debating whether it's right or wrong to hope someone dies, or to become vigilantes, or having an upvoat/downvoat war... let's proceed with a bit more logic than that. Especially if we want to be taken seriously.
And for the record, your attempt to dissect my name was moronic.
I didn't call for his persecution, but you stated that if he had a natural heart attack, you wouldn't wish him harm. Well, not caring if that prick dies from a heart attack is not the same as persecuting him, you shithead. I would actually rather see him serve a long sentence, but I'm not going to hope and pray for his recovery, idiot. CNN can fuck off, as they invent fake news anyway. Brock and CNN are propaganda machines for the globalists, they were involved in corrupt election tactics to favor Hillary and smear Trump, and Brock's playbook for undermining the Trump administration was leaked, and I read it. I don't GAF about that guy.
And for the record, or CTR, your username is "faggoty" regardless of the meaning.
Your commentary tells me all I need to know about your IQ score... keep up the low blows, they'll surely work.
Remove your head from your rectum for a moment and try to consider the possibility that if the elite's network begins to prematurely collapse, die off, get suicided, go off grid, or get Clinton'ed - we lose those chances for testimony, prosecution and further unraveling the truth.
So, while you may not GAF about him, I do... but not because I want him alive. I want his intel. His network. His order-givers/order-takers. Everything.
Think longer term than one corrupt POS kicking the can for a sense of temporary victory.
I have considered that, and you originally made that point as well, but your main point was that you basically thought it sad that harm would come to him, as if harm should never befall anyone even if they're bad/evil/corrupt. As if it was morally wrong to not wish the recovery of even a corrupt person such as Brock. All of you shills use the IQ comment. Turn the page in the Brock handbook and try a different character attack.
view the rest of the comments →
SoSpricyHotDog ago
I was told that if you don't have something nice to post, don't post it at all.
That is all I can say considering the above logic.
Truewarrior ago
Best news you heard yet today, eh?
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Actually... if it was a legitimate heart attack, I don't want to wish anyone harm. He's a twisted man conducting some very shady shit when it comes to disinformation - but that shouldn't carry a death sentence. On the flipside, if it was an orchestrated effort to silence him for some reason, I would also feel bad... as this would indicate he was willing to share much needed information.
Any of the "elite" or even their assistants that pass away limits the investigatory strength that could be flexed within future investigations.
Just my $0.02.
SuperJohnWayne ago
Your username is "So Spicy/Pricey HotDog?" Now why would you be defending Brock?
SoSpricyHotDog ago
How am I defending him you fucktard? I am simply stating what I've been stating the entire time... we need evidence to truly persecute those involved and put boots to throats (assuming the legal system fails us... which it very well may, even with evidence in-hand). Rushing to judgement of anyone with pitchforks and fires at the stakes is not a wise direction to move this.
Imagine for a moment if you will... CNN decides to stroll on to Voat and sees a comment like the one below: "killing them is maybe the best thing." That is a stupid thing to say. It erodes the seriousness of this by jumping to a conclusion that would end with someone being extinguished without having proper evidence.
So, instead of wasting our time debating whether it's right or wrong to hope someone dies, or to become vigilantes, or having an upvoat/downvoat war... let's proceed with a bit more logic than that. Especially if we want to be taken seriously.
And for the record, your attempt to dissect my name was moronic.
SuperJohnWayne ago
I didn't call for his persecution, but you stated that if he had a natural heart attack, you wouldn't wish him harm. Well, not caring if that prick dies from a heart attack is not the same as persecuting him, you shithead. I would actually rather see him serve a long sentence, but I'm not going to hope and pray for his recovery, idiot. CNN can fuck off, as they invent fake news anyway. Brock and CNN are propaganda machines for the globalists, they were involved in corrupt election tactics to favor Hillary and smear Trump, and Brock's playbook for undermining the Trump administration was leaked, and I read it. I don't GAF about that guy.
And for the record, or CTR, your username is "faggoty" regardless of the meaning.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Your commentary tells me all I need to know about your IQ score... keep up the low blows, they'll surely work.
Remove your head from your rectum for a moment and try to consider the possibility that if the elite's network begins to prematurely collapse, die off, get suicided, go off grid, or get Clinton'ed - we lose those chances for testimony, prosecution and further unraveling the truth.
So, while you may not GAF about him, I do... but not because I want him alive. I want his intel. His network. His order-givers/order-takers. Everything.
Think longer term than one corrupt POS kicking the can for a sense of temporary victory.
Your name is truly amazing.
SuperJohnWayne ago
I have considered that, and you originally made that point as well, but your main point was that you basically thought it sad that harm would come to him, as if harm should never befall anyone even if they're bad/evil/corrupt. As if it was morally wrong to not wish the recovery of even a corrupt person such as Brock. All of you shills use the IQ comment. Turn the page in the Brock handbook and try a different character attack.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Yes, I am a shill. You caught me.
Whatever. Done wasting my time with you.
SuperJohnWayne ago
Upvoated for your admitting to being a shill.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Upvoated for sense of humor.
Haha, let's bury the hatchet bro. Unity is how we'll take these fuckers down.