You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

usuck911 ago

Trump being at Epsteins Island on one occassion does not make him guilty.

He will be guilty however if after seeing the horrific things going on at Epsteins Island during first visit and then choosed to re-visit and re-visit manay times over like Bill Clinton who visited 20 times.

There is no evidence that Trump visited Epsteins Island more than the said first visit.

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

Epsteins butler named Trump as a person with "intimate knowledge of the pedophilic activities" surrounding Epstein.

The guys got what amounts to a mail order bride for Christ's sake. Not to mention the laundry list of sexual harassment complaints against him made BEFORE he took running for president seriously.

SterlingJB ago

I always thought the detail about him going to Epstein's dinner parties but eating with the butler in the kitchen rather than the rest of the guests was kind of funny. Seems like any at the top were swimming in the same pool with people like Epstein, so thinking he defs would know and hope he ran to do something about it. Can't see a already wealthy person would want the job in his golden years unless of course he's some sort illumanati grand deception anti-christ. But, yeah, not hoping for the latter. Plus, I didn't even vote for him, but it's pretty hard not to enjoy watching him make the establishment step into its own steaming pile of hypocrisy in their attempts to demonize and oust him. So not sure what the awareness of him being "in on it" does for this effort if he is indeed in on it. Way better off than if were H-rod since then there really wouldn't be a shot in hell this ever gets uncovered.

shizzle_mcbobblehead ago

Google Paolo Zampolli and the Paramount Group.

Paramount was a partnership between Zampolli (ran ID modeling agency, implicated in some pretty weird shit) and Trump to hire old models to market expensive Trump apartments.

SterlingJB ago

I've looked through a lot of this before. Lots of this info has been published here too. That's why I didn't get all the vitriol about wikileaks only publishing about HRC. His dirt has been out there for awhile. There's multiple books detailing it, which is why it said something about america's own opinion about its gov. I'm not holding my breath, but still hoping that his seemingly reactive nature might be influenced by the public, if that is, the public ever gives up its fetish with russia.