Would you rather run a short game for immediate results, or would your rather run a long game, plan for contingency, and execute said plan with as many allies as you can muster?
you can't truth bomb everyone and expect it to sink in; there's something called cognitive dissonance which means that person's brain literally can't process the information and will believe the lie rather than the truth because it's easier to comprehend. Sometimes you gotta ease into the subject like it's a gimp suit (to quote Archer) otherwise it'll go to shit.
You want to alienate people, make them dismiss you out of hand because they've been conditioned and programmed to perceive things a certain way? Go right on ahead. Some of us are thinking bigger picture, like the kind of big picture that involves a seething mass of humanity walking down DC, the HEY memes as signs. Everybody with a sign, so no matter where mainstream media is, they see the same questions asked over and over, that is assuming they actually cover it. It's going to take a coordinated effort to bring the proper attention to the issue, and forcing people to view it in a light that doesn't jive with their programming will ultimately backfire, imo. You do you, I'll do me, so on so forth. I think the main issue regardless of where one stands is the need to communicate human trafficking is enabled at the federal level. Everything else will fall into place through the course of mainstream investigation. Just have to get it to the tipping point where Ben Swann can freely cover the topic. Once he's free to do so, more mainstream "reporters" will fall in line.
view the rest of the comments →
MReiS ago
Would you rather run a short game for immediate results, or would your rather run a long game, plan for contingency, and execute said plan with as many allies as you can muster?
This is relevant and makes a good point; https://i.imgsafe.org/09e501d3c6.png
you can't truth bomb everyone and expect it to sink in; there's something called cognitive dissonance which means that person's brain literally can't process the information and will believe the lie rather than the truth because it's easier to comprehend. Sometimes you gotta ease into the subject like it's a gimp suit (to quote Archer) otherwise it'll go to shit.
You want to alienate people, make them dismiss you out of hand because they've been conditioned and programmed to perceive things a certain way? Go right on ahead. Some of us are thinking bigger picture, like the kind of big picture that involves a seething mass of humanity walking down DC, the HEY memes as signs. Everybody with a sign, so no matter where mainstream media is, they see the same questions asked over and over, that is assuming they actually cover it. It's going to take a coordinated effort to bring the proper attention to the issue, and forcing people to view it in a light that doesn't jive with their programming will ultimately backfire, imo. You do you, I'll do me, so on so forth. I think the main issue regardless of where one stands is the need to communicate human trafficking is enabled at the federal level. Everything else will fall into place through the course of mainstream investigation. Just have to get it to the tipping point where Ben Swann can freely cover the topic. Once he's free to do so, more mainstream "reporters" will fall in line.