I'm sure most everybody here will agree that Michael Jackson was at least... a bit odd. He made "special friends" with many prepubescent boys and allowed them to sleep in his bed with him. In an interview he said he liked going to Disney World and spending time watching children playing. He even built a theme park in his backyard too. Michael Jackson was one big man child essentially, or was he really?
Michael Jackson liked to think of himself as Peter Pan, which was a character that never grows up just like Jacko says about himself. Peter Pan liked to kidnap children as well. Excuse the Huff post link. Supposedly the original Peter Pan, not the Disney version , but the one from the book would kill the lost boys once they started to grow up.
"The boys on the island vary, of course, in numbers, according as they get killed and so on; and when they seem to be growing up, which is against the rules, Peter thins them out; but at this time there were six of them, counting the twins as two."
The funny thing about Michael Jackson was that he in-a-way stole children too. It seemed like he wanted the eight year olds he befriended to like him more than their parents by taking them on extravagant shopping sprees and fancy trips. Watch this documentary to learn more. Michael would then move on from friendships once the boys starting growing up.
There is barely an excuse for Michael to act out and complain that he didn't have a childhood. His siblings turned out fine and they didn't act like weirdos. The reasons why MJ says he didn't have a childhood are pretty lack luster. All I've heard him talk about was that his father beat him with a belt a lot and insulted his nose. Even if he really did have no childhood, what's the point in being friends with little boys? Why not befriend people who were children at heart like Disney animators or something?
I think Jacko is someone we need to investigate to help understand other potential pedos. If you don't believe me that he was suspicious, have a look at a list of confiscated items from a police raid on his house.
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
You raise some good points. Please note that t IN NO WAY condone, endorse, or excuse the horrific acts that Michael Jackson, the black Jew entertainer, perpetrated upon his victims. However, perhaps I can shed some light on some of this from a survivor's perspective.
"The funny thing about Michael Jackson was that he in-a-way stole children too. It seemed like he wanted the eight year olds he befriended to like him more than their parents by taking them on extravagant shopping sprees and fancy trips." -- Yes, he selfishly "stole" these children as though possessions for him to use/"own" as he saw fit. He was grooming the children, and their crappy parents were greedy sickos who no doubt liked the cash, gifts, etc. and didn't care enough about their own offspring to protect them from that predator. (Nobody can convince me that the parents didn't know this wasn't appropriate; nobody is that stupid. That they were in "denial" [because they didn't want to see] is also possible.) It has been discussed on this forum several times that there is a certain group that doesn't love/care for their own offspring as normal people do.
"There is barely an excuse for Michael to act out and complain that he didn't have a childhood. His siblings turned out fine and they didn't act like weirdos." -- Absolutely, there is NO excuse for his actions. Period. As for his siblings, study narcissistic personality disorder (NPD), and you will learn that parents can treat their own offspring in starkly different ways. Michael was likely the "scapegoat child," the child who couldn't do anything right and got into "trouble" more often because of it. Usually the more sensitive child is targeted for "special" abuse and is designated the scapegoat. Usually once the parent(s) choose a scapegoat, the rest of the family (other siblings, extended family) join in to abuse the child. Many times the parent overtly encourages the golden child(ren) to abuse the scapegoat. I haven't studied the Jackson family specifically so don't know who the "golden child(ren)" was/were. (There can be more than one, and the roles can also change).. As the term suggests, golden children "can do no wrong." This scapegoat child-golden child dichotomy is the epitome of black-white simplistic thinking that a certain group is known for.
"All I've heard him talk about was that his father beat him with a belt a lot and insulted his nose." -- Beatings with a belt can be quite severe, especially if the buckle is used or the belt has been modified (e.g., nails/spikes and/or holes in it). Even a "plain" belt or strap can cause severe injuries under certain circumstances (pressure exerted, number of "licks," part of body hit, how much and what type of clothing worn by victim, etc.). In addition, victims of severe child abuse rarely convey the frequency and severity of their abuse to others. This dark reality is something they somehow must learn to live with, and frequently they are so "shut down" they aren't in touch with the details of their painful memories and/or feelings to convey them anyway.
Dysfunctional families are expert at keeping secrets, and while some info has trickled out, we may never know how dark and sick the Jackson Family really is.
9l3l7m7m ago
"black Jew entertainer"? Are you a shill?
equineluvr ago
No. There are PLENTY of black Jews, e.g. O.J. Simpson and every other black actor.
Being Jewish is about GENES, not the religion of Judaism.