What do you mean no one is discussing it? i see people discussing it everywhere, everyday. The media, google and major social platforms are suppressing the true breadth of how many people are talking about it. I saw people on facebook over a week ago, 90k were talking about it just at the one moment i checked, now facebook doesn't show how many are talking it suppresses the numbers and it just took away the "latest posts" option a few days ago to check that way, on mine anyway. Don't fall for it.
No one researching here has come out and said they were John Doe. It's an easy discrediting tactic when no one can verify your person. Why else do people discredit anonymous sources? Because they can be complete bullshit without anyone even knowing.
Yeah not here, i can see why. But i see people on their real social media accounts, including myself who post about it to our personal networks and talk in person to people. Many of us don't hide our identity, on anon forums yes, on social media accounts with our friends and family, no. Also depends on the source, someone can post something i dont know who they are, but will check the source and if it's legit doesn't matter who posted it. Like the pedo symbols FBI list, i dont know who posted the source but i checked it and went to the FBI site and sure enough, its real.
view the rest of the comments →
Codewow ago
See here's the thing. I have a hard time believing anyone on these threads because no one is already publicly discussing any of it.
Cleareyes ago
What do you mean no one is discussing it? i see people discussing it everywhere, everyday. The media, google and major social platforms are suppressing the true breadth of how many people are talking about it. I saw people on facebook over a week ago, 90k were talking about it just at the one moment i checked, now facebook doesn't show how many are talking it suppresses the numbers and it just took away the "latest posts" option a few days ago to check that way, on mine anyway. Don't fall for it.
Codewow ago
No one researching here has come out and said they were John Doe. It's an easy discrediting tactic when no one can verify your person. Why else do people discredit anonymous sources? Because they can be complete bullshit without anyone even knowing.
Cleareyes ago
Yeah not here, i can see why. But i see people on their real social media accounts, including myself who post about it to our personal networks and talk in person to people. Many of us don't hide our identity, on anon forums yes, on social media accounts with our friends and family, no. Also depends on the source, someone can post something i dont know who they are, but will check the source and if it's legit doesn't matter who posted it. Like the pedo symbols FBI list, i dont know who posted the source but i checked it and went to the FBI site and sure enough, its real.