You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

organic1 ago

GLP has been compromised for a looonnngggg time. In fact, I don't believe it was ever created to be a good place for discussion about truth. If you want to get insta banned, just mention Tavistock.

shachalnur ago

Been posting on GLP for many years.

It's basically a data-mining operation.

Certain non-members,the stranger ones, will not be banned ,or only for a day or two.

But also a good place to check what subjects are really problematic.

Certain links,words and names are automatic bans,but theories are more interesting.

Combining certain facts will give you a ban as well,eventhough the names or facts in themselves will not be banned.

So through deduction GLP is very usefull

I was able to verify plenty this way

Posting that David Seaman and George Webb are both Jewish and seamingly untouchable.are weapons against Rothschild will get you banned,for example

organic1 ago

That's interesting! I considered that they were mainly gathering information and using comments to gauge the public's opinion and/or reaction about particular subjects and events, but I have to say that I never commented on there. I'd stop by to read every so often, and noticed that certain subjects would be off limits, but there always seemed to be a lot of trolls that would viciously attack an idea or attempt to derail. I was commenting on ATS for awhile and that's when I learned about GLP's ban hammer trends because their ex members would come to ATS to complain. No real difference between GLP and ATS though. Same thing with a different tag and skin. I really avoid both now because the topics I like to discuss are too tempting for the trolls, and I don't have time for that. It's fascinating what you've found in regards to how they react to Seaman and Webb!

shachalnur ago

Almost all conspiracy sites are disinfo,data-mining,secret service limited hangouts.(mostly CIA and Mossad)

Veterans Today is 100% CIA,for example.

So what?

They use you,but when they react by trolling,banning or otherwise,you use them.

Had some interesting email exchanges with the editor in chief,because my theories were becoming problematic for them.

And he said he's sorry,because he likes my ideas,but it's inconvenient for their site.

Once you understand the camps and powers involved,these sites become a source of information through deduction.

The fact they have to actively intervene in directing thought and opinion means they're on the backfoot.

So let's push forward.

No fear.

organic1 ago

Sounds like you were too near the bull's eye for them! That's cool. It seems you have a system that works and is making them work harder than they want, and are worried that your red pills were too potent. Nice going and keep it up!