I have witnessed a lot of confusion regarding the Pizzagate Vs Pedogate definitions lately. Citizen Investigators seem to have become increasingly uncomfortable using the term Pizzagate and I was wondering why that was. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using the term Pizzagate so long as you understand what it means.
**PIZZAGATE is LOCAL, PEDOGATE is GLOBAL**
Here is an article I read on this issue http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=68600 http://archive.is/rzKWv which describes extremely well the difference between the two terms and which was linked in this thread https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1726694 http://archive.is/ncWMO
Simplified explanation:
PIZZAGATE is the Washington D.C. child trafficking, SRA, pedophile rings used to keep high level politicians in check.
PEDOGATE is the Global Child Trafficking business mainly managed by the CIA and other countries' respective Secret Intelligence Agencies, for the Military Industrial Complex and other key Fortune 1000 companies scattered around the globe.
It is especially urgent to read this entire “Special Report” so that the Pizzagate lexicon and Pedogate back story can be properly understood.
N.B. The term PIZZA in Pizzagate is not so much related to the Pizza joint on Connecticut Avenue (Comet Ping Pong) as it is to the Pizza CODEWORD found in the WikiLeaks Podesta Emails' Dump.
I hope this helps clear things up for you all.
view the rest of the comments →
shakethetree ago
Local is a relative term. It is contingent upon a point of reference. Your backyard, home town, region, and nation-state. It is a matter of drawing a distinction. Turn around from the nation-state conglomeration, and you get the global/international. Terms can also be nested in one another, ie Pizzagate is a part of the larger network of Pedogate. Everything is connected eventually, but the mind needs to draw lines or it gets overwhelming. What will happen when we determine there is an external, off planet contingent manipulating Pedogate? New term, new reference point.