I don't think using the term "Deep State" is a good idea. It's a vague, trashcan term to begin with-- it avoids specifics. All they have to do is say, "Deep state? That is not we!" and ignore it. Plus some PG newbies may not know whom you're referring to. It's better to name the damn alphabets by name.
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
I don't think using the term "Deep State" is a good idea. It's a vague, trashcan term to begin with-- it avoids specifics. All they have to do is say, "Deep state? That is not we!" and ignore it. Plus some PG newbies may not know whom you're referring to. It's better to name the damn alphabets by name.
MolochHunter ago
fair enough. But how many alphabets do we need to cover. I suppose I could say 'intelligence services' instead