You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wincraft71 ago

Alright this is just a theory but, what if they fabricated this with a false leak on the Clintons to minimize damage and get it out first since the one we've been waiting for hasn't dropped yet. So then when the real leak drops it will be drowned out by the noise of this fake one, and when people do get exposed to the real leak they'll be too confused to figure out what's real or fake.

Basically, plead guilty to a lesser leak that's still somewhat damaging but not burn-down-the-house damaging, then when the real bombshell leak comes out tear it down as fake news and say the first fake leak was the real leak.

anonOpenPress ago

Wow, you think they'd be that clever? No but seriously, a worthy theory to add. Have an upvoat, and I'll keep this in mind.

wincraft71 ago

It would explain the "fake news", and some saying that the US is trying to discredit Wikileaks as of late, all tools to setup the stage for this big payoff.

If people are primed for it, they can push some narrative that makes Wikileaks look unreliable or compromised, pull the "Clinton is a victim" card which they did with the original PG, then talk people's head off over TV and the internet with all the facts and details of the fake misinformation, while the people pushing the real leak red-pills look like some "alt-right trolls" or "crackpot conspiracy theorists".

It's honestly a risky, shoddy plan IMO, but unfortunately I think it might just work, barely. From what I've seen so far there is a lot of kool-aid drinkers in the United States, and they are all too willing to reject alternative information and be told what to think.