It's not evidence of anything, it's an article copy-pasted into an email, sent as a "this is what some guy is saying" message. The Clinton/Podesta emails were full of these as well, they can't be taken as admissions of anything. The original article was public, and obviously didn't tip the scales when published. I doubt we'll ever find any smoking gun in the emails, but no harm looking.
The scales weren't tipped then, during the Bush administration, but not nearly as many people were paying attention. There's a lot more "woke" people now.
I'm an example. I was in my 20s during the Bush admin. I thought the crazy liberals were trying to smear Bush with all the talk of the government being in on 9/11. I also thought they were trying to smear him with the "there are no weapons of mass destruction". But now that I'm older, I'm actually watching and reading the 9/11 research and I'm wine.
Also, I see that Hillary and other dems supported the war in Iraq too. This led me to the truth of both the republicans and the dems wanting wars to destabilize nations to put in a puppet leader so they can strip the nations of their resources....poppy fields, oil, gold mines; arm the "rebels" that they trained and created through Soros propaganda; then traffick the war torn orphaned children through their "humanitarian non profit" organizations.
I am a conservative that would likely not have paid attention to this story on Bush back then. But back then there was no twitter and there were no communities like voat, Reddit, and 4chan. Maybe there were, but they certainly weren't as popular.
Now we have all of these ways to spread the truth and we have many more "woke" once were Bush supporters that no longer are due to knowing and accepting the truth. So maybe we can tip the scales now
Oh, you're absolutely right, scales are being tipped now that weren't before for sure. I started going to 4chan in 2008, and since I was a kid in the 80s I had heard all the conspiracy theories about the ancient Jewish satanic cult that controlled the world from the shadows, ruled by the Rothschilds, and called themselves the Illuminati. I dismissed the "9/11 is an inside job" stuff because the "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" stuff was so retarded. But, now that the pieces are coming together in a more plausible way (that Mossad/CIA used Saudi intelligence agents to set it up), I am open to evidence that it was. To me it looks 99% likely that pedogate is real, and that lends a lot of credibility to the tangent claims surrounding that "theory." Still though, I think we need new, real evidence, and the old conspiracy theory articles simply aren't going to cut it, no matter how good the circumstantial evidence is. If we keep at it, we will find it. It's hard enough for these bastards to hide when no one is looking for them, with thousands of us combing through their lives? They're going to get caught one way or another. If I were in their shoes, I throw in the towel and just stop the whole thing. But, of course they can't. Too much blackmail in every direction, if just a small percentage of the conspirators want to win or die trying it forces them all down that path.
Yeh. You're right. We do need hard evidence. I'm still surprised a little genius hacker couldn't find any images or film hidden in electronic correspondence or in that password required page on comet's website. Or even into the cameras on Epstein's island. I'm a real doofus with computers, but it seems like there a lot of little computer geniuses these days. It's likely too late now to find anything though. The pedos are aware
view the rest of the comments →
djaeveloplyse ago
It's not evidence of anything, it's an article copy-pasted into an email, sent as a "this is what some guy is saying" message. The Clinton/Podesta emails were full of these as well, they can't be taken as admissions of anything. The original article was public, and obviously didn't tip the scales when published. I doubt we'll ever find any smoking gun in the emails, but no harm looking.
Godwillwin ago
The scales weren't tipped then, during the Bush administration, but not nearly as many people were paying attention. There's a lot more "woke" people now.
I'm an example. I was in my 20s during the Bush admin. I thought the crazy liberals were trying to smear Bush with all the talk of the government being in on 9/11. I also thought they were trying to smear him with the "there are no weapons of mass destruction". But now that I'm older, I'm actually watching and reading the 9/11 research and I'm wine.
Also, I see that Hillary and other dems supported the war in Iraq too. This led me to the truth of both the republicans and the dems wanting wars to destabilize nations to put in a puppet leader so they can strip the nations of their resources....poppy fields, oil, gold mines; arm the "rebels" that they trained and created through Soros propaganda; then traffick the war torn orphaned children through their "humanitarian non profit" organizations.
I am a conservative that would likely not have paid attention to this story on Bush back then. But back then there was no twitter and there were no communities like voat, Reddit, and 4chan. Maybe there were, but they certainly weren't as popular.
Now we have all of these ways to spread the truth and we have many more "woke" once were Bush supporters that no longer are due to knowing and accepting the truth. So maybe we can tip the scales now
djaeveloplyse ago
Oh, you're absolutely right, scales are being tipped now that weren't before for sure. I started going to 4chan in 2008, and since I was a kid in the 80s I had heard all the conspiracy theories about the ancient Jewish satanic cult that controlled the world from the shadows, ruled by the Rothschilds, and called themselves the Illuminati. I dismissed the "9/11 is an inside job" stuff because the "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" stuff was so retarded. But, now that the pieces are coming together in a more plausible way (that Mossad/CIA used Saudi intelligence agents to set it up), I am open to evidence that it was. To me it looks 99% likely that pedogate is real, and that lends a lot of credibility to the tangent claims surrounding that "theory." Still though, I think we need new, real evidence, and the old conspiracy theory articles simply aren't going to cut it, no matter how good the circumstantial evidence is. If we keep at it, we will find it. It's hard enough for these bastards to hide when no one is looking for them, with thousands of us combing through their lives? They're going to get caught one way or another. If I were in their shoes, I throw in the towel and just stop the whole thing. But, of course they can't. Too much blackmail in every direction, if just a small percentage of the conspirators want to win or die trying it forces them all down that path.
Godwillwin ago
Yeh. You're right. We do need hard evidence. I'm still surprised a little genius hacker couldn't find any images or film hidden in electronic correspondence or in that password required page on comet's website. Or even into the cameras on Epstein's island. I'm a real doofus with computers, but it seems like there a lot of little computer geniuses these days. It's likely too late now to find anything though. The pedos are aware